Taxonomic comments on the validity of Echinostoma miyagawai Ischii, 1932 (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F20%3A43919130" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/20:43919130 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2019.101931" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2019.101931</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2019.101931" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.parint.2019.101931</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Taxonomic comments on the validity of Echinostoma miyagawai Ischii, 1932 (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In a study that was published recently in this journal, Mohanta et al. [1] rejected the previous studies by Aneta Kostadinova and her colleagues [[2], [3], [4]]. Specifically, Mohanta et al. [1] suggested the synonymy of Echinostoma robustum Yamaguti, 1935, Echinostoma miyagawai Ischii, 1932, Echinostoma friedi Toledo, Munoz-Antoli &amp; Esteban, 2000, and Echinostoma revolutum (Fröhlich, 1802). Mohanta et al. claimed that because of negligible differences in the ND1 locus sequences: &quot;These values suggest that these Echinostoma isolates, which were identified as different species, are conspecific.&quot; Nevertheless, in parallel, they continued to distinguish between E. robustum and E. revolutum in most of their analyses and proposed the existence of American and Eurasian clades of E. robustum, while they excluded the matching publicly available samples of Australian origin from the analyses without noting that [1]. While other reports agree on the synonymy of E. robustum and E. friedi, the possible synonymy of E. miyagawai with the two above-mentioned species requires further research, and the synonymy of E. miyagawai with E. revolutum lacks sufficient support. Because incorrect identifications of E. revolutum are repeatedly published, below I discuss the misidentifications that have a potential to cause incorrect genetic diagnoses of isolates from the E. revolutum species complex, particularly E. miyagawai.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Taxonomic comments on the validity of Echinostoma miyagawai Ischii, 1932 (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae)

Popis výsledku anglicky

In a study that was published recently in this journal, Mohanta et al. [1] rejected the previous studies by Aneta Kostadinova and her colleagues [[2], [3], [4]]. Specifically, Mohanta et al. [1] suggested the synonymy of Echinostoma robustum Yamaguti, 1935, Echinostoma miyagawai Ischii, 1932, Echinostoma friedi Toledo, Munoz-Antoli &amp; Esteban, 2000, and Echinostoma revolutum (Fröhlich, 1802). Mohanta et al. claimed that because of negligible differences in the ND1 locus sequences: &quot;These values suggest that these Echinostoma isolates, which were identified as different species, are conspecific.&quot; Nevertheless, in parallel, they continued to distinguish between E. robustum and E. revolutum in most of their analyses and proposed the existence of American and Eurasian clades of E. robustum, while they excluded the matching publicly available samples of Australian origin from the analyses without noting that [1]. While other reports agree on the synonymy of E. robustum and E. friedi, the possible synonymy of E. miyagawai with the two above-mentioned species requires further research, and the synonymy of E. miyagawai with E. revolutum lacks sufficient support. Because incorrect identifications of E. revolutum are repeatedly published, below I discuss the misidentifications that have a potential to cause incorrect genetic diagnoses of isolates from the E. revolutum species complex, particularly E. miyagawai.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10608 - Biochemistry and molecular biology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Parasitology International

ISSN

1383-5769

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

74

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

February

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

2

Strana od-do

"Article 101931"

Kód UT WoS článku

000498749900022

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85074402783