Otorhinolaryngology in the COVID-19 era: there significant differences between hospital-based and private practices?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F21%3A43921082" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/21:43921082 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/21:10422151 RIV/00064203:_____/21:10422151 RIV/00064173:_____/21:N0000174

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14054" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14054</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14054" target="_blank" >10.1111/ijcp.14054</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Otorhinolaryngology in the COVID-19 era: there significant differences between hospital-based and private practices?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 disease has an incredible impact on both hospital-based and private practices in the field of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery. Practical issues faced by both types of practices have not been well addressed in most studies. A national survey was conducted in April 2020 to identify the challenges faced by otorhinolaryngologists practicing in Czech Republic. DESIGN: Prospective questionnaire-based study SETTING: Online google questionnaire sent to members of the Czech Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery PARTICIPANTS: All doctors practicing Otorhinolaryngology in Czech Republic with access to the online questionnaire between 15(th) and 26(th) April 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary aims of the study were to evaluate any significant differences between the two types of practice in the field of Otorhinolaryngology. We formulated null hypotheses stating there were no statistical differences in the preparation and availability of personal protective equipment amongst both practices a month after the first cases of COVID-19 in Czech Republic. Statistical analyses including the Mann-Whitney U test were performed to test the hypotheses. RESULTS: Analysis and results were based on completion of the entire questionnaire by the doctors. There were no statistically significant differences between both the practices, however individual analyses of both the practices showed a different outcome. CONCLUSION: Despite our statistical results, it was observed that private practices faced more deficits and were more financially vulnerable. They were also other issues reported by both practices that could compromise the care of patients, functioning of workplaces and support of doctors.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Otorhinolaryngology in the COVID-19 era: there significant differences between hospital-based and private practices?

Popis výsledku anglicky

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 disease has an incredible impact on both hospital-based and private practices in the field of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery. Practical issues faced by both types of practices have not been well addressed in most studies. A national survey was conducted in April 2020 to identify the challenges faced by otorhinolaryngologists practicing in Czech Republic. DESIGN: Prospective questionnaire-based study SETTING: Online google questionnaire sent to members of the Czech Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery PARTICIPANTS: All doctors practicing Otorhinolaryngology in Czech Republic with access to the online questionnaire between 15(th) and 26(th) April 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary aims of the study were to evaluate any significant differences between the two types of practice in the field of Otorhinolaryngology. We formulated null hypotheses stating there were no statistical differences in the preparation and availability of personal protective equipment amongst both practices a month after the first cases of COVID-19 in Czech Republic. Statistical analyses including the Mann-Whitney U test were performed to test the hypotheses. RESULTS: Analysis and results were based on completion of the entire questionnaire by the doctors. There were no statistically significant differences between both the practices, however individual analyses of both the practices showed a different outcome. CONCLUSION: Despite our statistical results, it was observed that private practices faced more deficits and were more financially vulnerable. They were also other issues reported by both practices that could compromise the care of patients, functioning of workplaces and support of doctors.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30206 - Otorhinolaryngology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Clinical Practice

ISSN

1368-5031

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

75

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

"e14054"

Kód UT WoS článku

000616619700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85100734218