The Slavcleft: A three-center study of the outcome of treatment of cleft lip and palate. Nasolabial appearance

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F21%3A43921204" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/21:43921204 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00064173:_____/21:N0000263 RIV/61989592:15110/21:73611404

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10631" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10631</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10631" target="_blank" >10.7717/peerj.10631</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Slavcleft: A three-center study of the outcome of treatment of cleft lip and palate. Nasolabial appearance

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: There is a multitude of protocols of treatment of cleft lip and palate (CLP) worldwide differing in number of operations, surgical techniques, and timings of surgeries. Despite, facial appearance in subjects with CLP is rarely ideal and residual stigmata are easy to notice in many patients irrespective of the protocol. The prospective controlled investigations are optimal for comparing effectiveness of treatment protocols. Because prospective studies are very challenging to perform in CLP field, it is reasonable to retrospectively assess different surgical protocols to identify the promising ones and then to test them in a prospective way. Methods: Our objective was to assess the nasolabial appearance in a preadolescent Slavic population with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) by using the 0 200 numeric scale with reference photographs. Patients treated in Warsaw, Poland (n = 32), Prague, Czech Republic (n = 26) and Bratislava, Slovakia (n = 17) were included in this retrospective study. Each cleft center used a unique surgical protocol. Two panels of professional raters (n = 7) and laypeople (n = 10) scored blindly the nasolabial esthetics on cropped frontal and profile images with cropped reference photograph present on the same slide. Intra-and inter-rater agreement was assessed with Cronbach s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients, t-Tests, and Bland Altman plots. Inter-group differences were evaluated with one-way ANOVA and regression analysis. Results: The agreement within and between raters was acceptable. We found that patients treated in Warsaw, Prague, and Bratislava showed comparable nasolabial appearance on frontal and profile photographs when judged by both professional raters (p 0.05) and laypeople (p 0.05). Regression analysis did not identify influence of gender, group (i.e., Warsaw, Prague, and Bratislava), age at lip repair, surgeon, and age at photographic assessment on esthetic outcome (p 0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that none of the surgical protocols showed superiority to produce good nasolabial appearance.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Slavcleft: A three-center study of the outcome of treatment of cleft lip and palate. Nasolabial appearance

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: There is a multitude of protocols of treatment of cleft lip and palate (CLP) worldwide differing in number of operations, surgical techniques, and timings of surgeries. Despite, facial appearance in subjects with CLP is rarely ideal and residual stigmata are easy to notice in many patients irrespective of the protocol. The prospective controlled investigations are optimal for comparing effectiveness of treatment protocols. Because prospective studies are very challenging to perform in CLP field, it is reasonable to retrospectively assess different surgical protocols to identify the promising ones and then to test them in a prospective way. Methods: Our objective was to assess the nasolabial appearance in a preadolescent Slavic population with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) by using the 0 200 numeric scale with reference photographs. Patients treated in Warsaw, Poland (n = 32), Prague, Czech Republic (n = 26) and Bratislava, Slovakia (n = 17) were included in this retrospective study. Each cleft center used a unique surgical protocol. Two panels of professional raters (n = 7) and laypeople (n = 10) scored blindly the nasolabial esthetics on cropped frontal and profile images with cropped reference photograph present on the same slide. Intra-and inter-rater agreement was assessed with Cronbach s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients, t-Tests, and Bland Altman plots. Inter-group differences were evaluated with one-way ANOVA and regression analysis. Results: The agreement within and between raters was acceptable. We found that patients treated in Warsaw, Prague, and Bratislava showed comparable nasolabial appearance on frontal and profile photographs when judged by both professional raters (p 0.05) and laypeople (p 0.05). Regression analysis did not identify influence of gender, group (i.e., Warsaw, Prague, and Bratislava), age at lip repair, surgeon, and age at photographic assessment on esthetic outcome (p 0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that none of the surgical protocols showed superiority to produce good nasolabial appearance.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30208 - Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

PeerJ

ISSN

2167-8359

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

February

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

"e10631"

Kód UT WoS článku

000616406800006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85101022405