Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Image-guided radiation therapy produces lower acute and chronic gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F21%3A43921808" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/21:43921808 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/60162694:G44__/21:00557094 RIV/00216208:11110/21:10429425 RIV/61989592:15110/21:73608595

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://jbuon.com/archive/26-3-940.pdf" target="_blank" >https://jbuon.com/archive/26-3-940.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Image-guided radiation therapy produces lower acute and chronic gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Purpose: This paper compares individual radiation therapy techniques used for prostate cancer and their benefits in clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 921 patients with localized prostate tumors treated between 1997 and 2012. We divided the patients into four groups according to the selected treatment technique (conformal radiation therapy [3DCRT], intensity-modulated radiation therapy [IMRT], image-guided radiation therapy [IGRT], and volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT]) and evaluated the incidence of acute and chronic gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. Results: The incidence of grade 2 or greater acute GU and GI toxicity was significantly higher among techniques other than IGRT (p&lt;0.001). We found the same results in the case of grade 3 or greater acute GU toxicity (p&lt;0.001). Grade 3 or higher acute GI toxicity occurred only in one patient treated by 3DCRT. Cumulative late GI toxicity of grade 2 or higher and grade 3 or higher was recorded over 3 years significantly more frequently among non-IGRT techniques as compared to IGRT (p&lt;0.001). As regards GU toxicity, we found significantly higher incidence only for grade 2 or higher (p&lt;0.001), not for grade 3 or higher. No occurrence of grade 4 toxicity was recorded. The greatest incidence of patients without acute and chronic GI/GU toxicity was recorded in connection with VMAT. Conclusions: IGRT demonstrated a pronounced reduction in acute and chronic GU and GI toxicity as compared to non-IGRT techniques in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Image-guided radiation therapy produces lower acute and chronic gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Purpose: This paper compares individual radiation therapy techniques used for prostate cancer and their benefits in clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 921 patients with localized prostate tumors treated between 1997 and 2012. We divided the patients into four groups according to the selected treatment technique (conformal radiation therapy [3DCRT], intensity-modulated radiation therapy [IMRT], image-guided radiation therapy [IGRT], and volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT]) and evaluated the incidence of acute and chronic gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. Results: The incidence of grade 2 or greater acute GU and GI toxicity was significantly higher among techniques other than IGRT (p&lt;0.001). We found the same results in the case of grade 3 or greater acute GU toxicity (p&lt;0.001). Grade 3 or higher acute GI toxicity occurred only in one patient treated by 3DCRT. Cumulative late GI toxicity of grade 2 or higher and grade 3 or higher was recorded over 3 years significantly more frequently among non-IGRT techniques as compared to IGRT (p&lt;0.001). As regards GU toxicity, we found significantly higher incidence only for grade 2 or higher (p&lt;0.001), not for grade 3 or higher. No occurrence of grade 4 toxicity was recorded. The greatest incidence of patients without acute and chronic GI/GU toxicity was recorded in connection with VMAT. Conclusions: IGRT demonstrated a pronounced reduction in acute and chronic GU and GI toxicity as compared to non-IGRT techniques in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30204 - Oncology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Journal of B.U.O.N.

  • ISSN

    1107-0625

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    26

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    3

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GR - Řecká republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    9

  • Strana od-do

    940-948

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000668891800005

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85109739632