International cooperative study identifies treatment strategy in childhood ambiguous lineage leukemia

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11130%2F18%3A10376840" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11130/18:10376840 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00064203:_____/18:10376840 RIV/00216208:11110/18:10376840 RIV/00064165:_____/18:10376840

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-12-821363" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-12-821363</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-12-821363" target="_blank" >10.1182/blood-2017-12-821363</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

International cooperative study identifies treatment strategy in childhood ambiguous lineage leukemia

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Despite attempts to improve the definitions of ambiguous lineage leukemia (ALAL) during the last 2 decades, general therapy recommendations are missing. Herein, we report a large cohort of children with ALAL and propose a treatment strategy. A retrospective multinational study (International Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Study of Leukemias of Ambiguous Lineage [iBFM-AMBI2012]) of 233 cases of pediatric ALAL patients is presented. Survival statistics were used to compare the prognosis of subsets and types of treatment. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)type primary therapy (80% +/- 4%) was superior to that of children who received acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-type or combined-type treatment (36% +/- 7.2% and 50% +/- 12%, respectively). When ALL-or AML-specific gene fusions were excluded, 5-year EFS of CD19(+) leukemia was 83% +/- 5.3% on ALL-type primary treatment compared with 0% +/- 0% and 28% +/- 14% on AML-type and combined-type primary treatment, respectively. Superiority of ALL-type treatment was documented in single-population mixed phenotype ALAL (using World Health Organization and/or European Group for Immunophenotyping of Leukemia definitions) and bilineal ALAL. Treatment with ALL-type protocols is recommended for the majority of pediatric patients with ALAL, including cases with CD19(+) ALAL. AML-type treatment is preferred in a minority of ALAL cases with CD19(-) and no other lymphoid features. No overall benefit of transplantation was documented, and it could be introduced in some patients with a poor response to treatment. As no clear indicator was found for a change in treatment type, this is to be considered only in cases with &gt;= 5% blasts after remission induction. The results provide a basis for a prospective trial.

Název v anglickém jazyce

International cooperative study identifies treatment strategy in childhood ambiguous lineage leukemia

Popis výsledku anglicky

Despite attempts to improve the definitions of ambiguous lineage leukemia (ALAL) during the last 2 decades, general therapy recommendations are missing. Herein, we report a large cohort of children with ALAL and propose a treatment strategy. A retrospective multinational study (International Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Study of Leukemias of Ambiguous Lineage [iBFM-AMBI2012]) of 233 cases of pediatric ALAL patients is presented. Survival statistics were used to compare the prognosis of subsets and types of treatment. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)type primary therapy (80% +/- 4%) was superior to that of children who received acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-type or combined-type treatment (36% +/- 7.2% and 50% +/- 12%, respectively). When ALL-or AML-specific gene fusions were excluded, 5-year EFS of CD19(+) leukemia was 83% +/- 5.3% on ALL-type primary treatment compared with 0% +/- 0% and 28% +/- 14% on AML-type and combined-type primary treatment, respectively. Superiority of ALL-type treatment was documented in single-population mixed phenotype ALAL (using World Health Organization and/or European Group for Immunophenotyping of Leukemia definitions) and bilineal ALAL. Treatment with ALL-type protocols is recommended for the majority of pediatric patients with ALAL, including cases with CD19(+) ALAL. AML-type treatment is preferred in a minority of ALAL cases with CD19(-) and no other lymphoid features. No overall benefit of transplantation was documented, and it could be introduced in some patients with a poor response to treatment. As no clear indicator was found for a change in treatment type, this is to be considered only in cases with &gt;= 5% blasts after remission induction. The results provide a basis for a prospective trial.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30204 - Oncology

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Blood

ISSN

0006-4971

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

132

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

264-276

Kód UT WoS článku

000439131800007

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85050103393