When the situation almost cannot be worse...

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11130%2F18%3A10380200" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11130/18:10380200 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00064203:_____/18:10380200

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.78321" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.78321</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.78321" target="_blank" >10.5114/aic.2018.78321</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

When the situation almost cannot be worse...

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

A 60-year-old man without a history of coronary artery disease presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). During transportation to the hospital, he developed ventricular fibrillation and later pulseless electrical activity. Chest compressions with an automated mechanical compression-decompression device (aMCD) were initiated. Coronary angiography showed total occlusion of the unprotected left main coronary artery (uLM), and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed during continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). After the reperfusion, the patient&apos;s heart started to generate effective contractions and aMCD could be discontinued. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved after 90 min of cardiac arrest. The patient died of cardiogenic shock 11 h later. This is one of several potential clinical scenarios of patients with uLM occlusion. Reperfusion was performed in a timely manner, but the patient still died. What are the causes of such unfavorable progress? Is there any possibility of discovering how to increase the chance of surviving this critical situation? The authors of the article &quot;Acute, total occlusion of the left main stem: coronary intervention options, outcomes, and recommendations&quot; published in the current issue of &quot;Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej&quot; presented their own experience with this uncommon but often catastrophic event. In a group of 23 patients, they found that these patients frequently experience cardiogenic shock (87%), after or during CPR (52%), and even with a procedural success rate of 91%, the in-hospital and 6-month mortality rates were high (57% and 65%, respectively).

Název v anglickém jazyce

When the situation almost cannot be worse...

Popis výsledku anglicky

A 60-year-old man without a history of coronary artery disease presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). During transportation to the hospital, he developed ventricular fibrillation and later pulseless electrical activity. Chest compressions with an automated mechanical compression-decompression device (aMCD) were initiated. Coronary angiography showed total occlusion of the unprotected left main coronary artery (uLM), and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed during continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). After the reperfusion, the patient&apos;s heart started to generate effective contractions and aMCD could be discontinued. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved after 90 min of cardiac arrest. The patient died of cardiogenic shock 11 h later. This is one of several potential clinical scenarios of patients with uLM occlusion. Reperfusion was performed in a timely manner, but the patient still died. What are the causes of such unfavorable progress? Is there any possibility of discovering how to increase the chance of surviving this critical situation? The authors of the article &quot;Acute, total occlusion of the left main stem: coronary intervention options, outcomes, and recommendations&quot; published in the current issue of &quot;Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej&quot; presented their own experience with this uncommon but often catastrophic event. In a group of 23 patients, they found that these patients frequently experience cardiogenic shock (87%), after or during CPR (52%), and even with a procedural success rate of 91%, the in-hospital and 6-month mortality rates were high (57% and 65%, respectively).

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů