Voiding difficulties after vaginal mesh cystocele repair: does the perivesical dissection matter?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F13%3A10138870" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/13:10138870 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00192-012-2030-6" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00192-012-2030-6</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-2030-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00192-012-2030-6</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Voiding difficulties after vaginal mesh cystocele repair: does the perivesical dissection matter?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Our purpose was to verify whether extensive dissection toward the sacrospinous ligament(SSL) needed for mesh fixation during anterior compartment repair increases the risk of postoperative voiding difficulties.A total of 124 patients after anterior compartment mesh repair without simultaneous suburethral sling placement operated on in the period 2005-2012 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study.Patients with previous anti-incontinence surgery with normal urodynamics were not excluded;30patients with incomplete data,severe perioperative complications,and urinary retention before and after the surgery were excluded.Urinary retention was defined as post-void residual over 150 ml more than 48 h after permanent catheter removal.The rate ofurinary retention after anterior compartment repair by mesh anchored to the SSL from an anterior approach (SSLS group) was compared to that following transobturator mesh repair often combined with SSL fixation from the posterior approach

Název v anglickém jazyce

Voiding difficulties after vaginal mesh cystocele repair: does the perivesical dissection matter?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Our purpose was to verify whether extensive dissection toward the sacrospinous ligament(SSL) needed for mesh fixation during anterior compartment repair increases the risk of postoperative voiding difficulties.A total of 124 patients after anterior compartment mesh repair without simultaneous suburethral sling placement operated on in the period 2005-2012 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study.Patients with previous anti-incontinence surgery with normal urodynamics were not excluded;30patients with incomplete data,severe perioperative complications,and urinary retention before and after the surgery were excluded.Urinary retention was defined as post-void residual over 150 ml more than 48 h after permanent catheter removal.The rate ofurinary retention after anterior compartment repair by mesh anchored to the SSL from an anterior approach (SSLS group) was compared to that following transobturator mesh repair often combined with SSL fixation from the posterior approach

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FK - Gynekologie a porodnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

ISSN

0937-3462

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

1385-1390

Kód UT WoS článku

000322135700021

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—