Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F14%3A10173633" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/14:10173633 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/49777513:23520/14:43922903 RIV/49777513:23640/14:43922903

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00192-013-2164-1" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00192-013-2164-1</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2164-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00192-013-2164-1</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Abstract Introduction and hypothesis We compared hands-on manual perineal protection (MPP) and hands-off delivery techniques using the basic principles of mechanics and assessed the tension of perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of theperineum. We also measured the effect of the thumb and index finger of the accoucheur's dominantposterior hand on perineal tissue tension when a modified Viennese method of MPP is performed. Methods Hands-off and two variations of hands-on manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery were simulated using a biomechanical model, with the main outcome measure being strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. Results Stress distribution with the hands-on model shows that whenusingMPP, the value of highest stress was decreased by 39 % (model B) and by 30 % (model C) compared with the hands-off model A. On the cross section there is a significant decrease in areas of equal tension throughout the perineal body i

Název v anglickém jazyce

Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery

Popis výsledku anglicky

Abstract Introduction and hypothesis We compared hands-on manual perineal protection (MPP) and hands-off delivery techniques using the basic principles of mechanics and assessed the tension of perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of theperineum. We also measured the effect of the thumb and index finger of the accoucheur's dominantposterior hand on perineal tissue tension when a modified Viennese method of MPP is performed. Methods Hands-off and two variations of hands-on manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery were simulated using a biomechanical model, with the main outcome measure being strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. Results Stress distribution with the hands-on model shows that whenusingMPP, the value of highest stress was decreased by 39 % (model B) and by 30 % (model C) compared with the hands-off model A. On the cross section there is a significant decrease in areas of equal tension throughout the perineal body i

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FK - Gynekologie a porodnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/ED1.1.00%2F02.0090" target="_blank" >ED1.1.00/02.0090: NTIS - Nové technologie pro informační společnost</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Urogynecology Journal

ISSN

0937-3462

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

25

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

65-71

Kód UT WoS článku

000329098400010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—