Procidentia in pregnancy: a systematic review and recommendations for practice

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F15%3A10296614" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/15:10296614 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00192-014-2595-3" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00192-014-2595-3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2595-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00192-014-2595-3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Procidentia in pregnancy: a systematic review and recommendations for practice

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in pregnancy is a rare condition with decreasing incidence and improved management and outcome world-wide recently. Systematic review of the literature for cases of POP in pregnancy published since1990 was carried out to identify common factors in presentation, management and outcomes. One case from our own practice was added to the analysis. METHODS: An extensive search of the Pubmed/Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was performed toidentify all cases of POP in pregnancy since 1990. Published case reports of POP in pregnancy were reviewed and summarized in tables to find similarities in history, course, management and outcome of the pregnancies. RESULTS: Of the 43 cases and one caseseries, 41 case studies were eligible for analysis. Two types of POP in pregnancy were identified: preexisting is less common (14 vs 27 cases), often resolves during pregnancy (5 out of 14) and always recurs after delivery (14 out of 14)

Název v anglickém jazyce

Procidentia in pregnancy: a systematic review and recommendations for practice

Popis výsledku anglicky

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in pregnancy is a rare condition with decreasing incidence and improved management and outcome world-wide recently. Systematic review of the literature for cases of POP in pregnancy published since1990 was carried out to identify common factors in presentation, management and outcomes. One case from our own practice was added to the analysis. METHODS: An extensive search of the Pubmed/Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was performed toidentify all cases of POP in pregnancy since 1990. Published case reports of POP in pregnancy were reviewed and summarized in tables to find similarities in history, course, management and outcome of the pregnancies. RESULTS: Of the 43 cases and one caseseries, 41 case studies were eligible for analysis. Two types of POP in pregnancy were identified: preexisting is less common (14 vs 27 cases), often resolves during pregnancy (5 out of 14) and always recurs after delivery (14 out of 14)

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FK - Gynekologie a porodnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Urogynecology Journal

ISSN

0937-3462

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

26

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

1103-1109

Kód UT WoS článku

000361229500003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84938988459