Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Long-term effectiveness of recommended boosted protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy in Europe

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F18%3A10374335" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/18:10374335 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00669806:_____/18:10374335

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12581" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12581</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12581" target="_blank" >10.1111/hiv.12581</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Long-term effectiveness of recommended boosted protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy in Europe

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term response to antiretroviral treatment (ART) based on atazanavir/ritonavir (ATZ/r)-, darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)-, and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-containing regimens. MethodsData were analysed for 5678 EuroSIDA-enrolled patients starting a DRV/r-, ATZ/r- or LPV/r-containing regimen between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2013. Separate analyses were performed for the following subgroups of patients: (1) ART-naive subjects (8%) at ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) initiation; (2) ART-experienced individuals (44%) initiating the new PI/r with a viral load (VL) 500 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL; and (3) ART-experienced patients (48%) initiating the new PI/r with a VL &gt;500 copies/mL. Virological failure (VF) was defined as two consecutive VL measurements &gt;200 copies/mL 24 weeks after PI/r initiation. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models were used to compare risks of failure by PI/r-based regimen. The main analysis was performed with intention-to-treat (ITT) ignoring treatment switches. ResultsThe time to VF favoured DRV/r over ATZ/r, and both were superior to LPV/r (log-rank test; P &lt; 0.02) in all analyses. Nevertheless, the risk of VF in ART-naive patients was similar regardless of the PI/r initiated after controlling for potential confounders. The risk of VF in both treatment-experienced groups was lower for DRV/r than for ATZ/r, which, in turn, was lower than for LPV/r-based ART. ConclusionsAlthough confounding by indication and calendar year cannot be completely ruled out, in ART-experienced subjects the long-term effectiveness of DRV/r-containing regimens appears to be greater than that of ATZ/r and LPV/r.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Long-term effectiveness of recommended boosted protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy in Europe

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term response to antiretroviral treatment (ART) based on atazanavir/ritonavir (ATZ/r)-, darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)-, and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-containing regimens. MethodsData were analysed for 5678 EuroSIDA-enrolled patients starting a DRV/r-, ATZ/r- or LPV/r-containing regimen between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2013. Separate analyses were performed for the following subgroups of patients: (1) ART-naive subjects (8%) at ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) initiation; (2) ART-experienced individuals (44%) initiating the new PI/r with a viral load (VL) 500 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL; and (3) ART-experienced patients (48%) initiating the new PI/r with a VL &gt;500 copies/mL. Virological failure (VF) was defined as two consecutive VL measurements &gt;200 copies/mL 24 weeks after PI/r initiation. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models were used to compare risks of failure by PI/r-based regimen. The main analysis was performed with intention-to-treat (ITT) ignoring treatment switches. ResultsThe time to VF favoured DRV/r over ATZ/r, and both were superior to LPV/r (log-rank test; P &lt; 0.02) in all analyses. Nevertheless, the risk of VF in ART-naive patients was similar regardless of the PI/r initiated after controlling for potential confounders. The risk of VF in both treatment-experienced groups was lower for DRV/r than for ATZ/r, which, in turn, was lower than for LPV/r-based ART. ConclusionsAlthough confounding by indication and calendar year cannot be completely ruled out, in ART-experienced subjects the long-term effectiveness of DRV/r-containing regimens appears to be greater than that of ATZ/r and LPV/r.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30303 - Infectious Diseases

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    HIV Medicine

  • ISSN

    1464-2662

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    19

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    5

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    15

  • Strana od-do

    324-338

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000430107500005

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85041304540