A multicentre study on unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F18%3A10380827" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/18:10380827 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14110/18:00103952 RIV/65269705:_____/18:00068809 RIV/00179906:_____/18:10380827 RIV/00669806:_____/18:10380827 RIV/00159816:_____/18:00068809

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1425606" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1425606</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1425606" target="_blank" >10.1080/08037051.2018.1425606</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A multicentre study on unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aims: Unattended automated office blood pressure (uAutoOBP) may eliminate white-coat effect. In the present study, we studied its relationships to attended office blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).Material and methods: Stable treated hypertensive subjects were examined in four Czech academic hypertension centres. uAutoOBP was measured with the BP Tru device; attended BP was measured six times: three times with auscultatory method (AuscOBP) by the physician followed optionally by three oscillometric measurements (OscOBP). ABPM was performed within one week from the clinical visit.Results: Data on 172 subjects aged 63.712.4 years with AuscOBP 127.6 +/- 12.1/77.6 +/- 10.0mm Hg are reported. uAutoOBP was by 8.5 +/- 9.0/3.0 +/- 6.1mm Hg lower than AuscOBP. The AuscOBP-uAutoOBP difference increased with the AuscOBP level and it did not depend on any other factor. OscOBP differed by 8.6 +/- 8.6/1.9 +/- 5.7mm Hg from uAutoOBP. 24-hour mean BP was by 4.2 +/- 12.1/3.5 +/- 7.8mm Hg lower than AuscOBP and by 4.3 +/- 11.0/0.5 +/- 6.9mm Hg higher than uAutoOBP; the correlation coefficients of 24-hour mean BP with AuscOBP and with uAutoOBP did not differ (p for difference.13). In the lowest BP group (systolic AuscOBP&lt;120mm Hg or diastolic AuscOBP&lt;70mm Hg), both AuscOBP and uAutoOBP were lower than 24-hour mean BP, while in the highest BP group (systolic AuscOBP140mm Hg or diastolic AuscOBP90mm Hg), they were higher.Conclusions: Compared to uAutoOBP, attended BP measurement gives higher values, both when measured with auscultatory or oscillometric method. Inter-individual variability of AutoOBP - uAuscOBP difference, as well of uAutoOBP - ABPM difference, is large. We did not prove that uAutoOBP would be associated to 24-hour ambulatory BP more closely than attended BP.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A multicentre study on unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aims: Unattended automated office blood pressure (uAutoOBP) may eliminate white-coat effect. In the present study, we studied its relationships to attended office blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).Material and methods: Stable treated hypertensive subjects were examined in four Czech academic hypertension centres. uAutoOBP was measured with the BP Tru device; attended BP was measured six times: three times with auscultatory method (AuscOBP) by the physician followed optionally by three oscillometric measurements (OscOBP). ABPM was performed within one week from the clinical visit.Results: Data on 172 subjects aged 63.712.4 years with AuscOBP 127.6 +/- 12.1/77.6 +/- 10.0mm Hg are reported. uAutoOBP was by 8.5 +/- 9.0/3.0 +/- 6.1mm Hg lower than AuscOBP. The AuscOBP-uAutoOBP difference increased with the AuscOBP level and it did not depend on any other factor. OscOBP differed by 8.6 +/- 8.6/1.9 +/- 5.7mm Hg from uAutoOBP. 24-hour mean BP was by 4.2 +/- 12.1/3.5 +/- 7.8mm Hg lower than AuscOBP and by 4.3 +/- 11.0/0.5 +/- 6.9mm Hg higher than uAutoOBP; the correlation coefficients of 24-hour mean BP with AuscOBP and with uAutoOBP did not differ (p for difference.13). In the lowest BP group (systolic AuscOBP&lt;120mm Hg or diastolic AuscOBP&lt;70mm Hg), both AuscOBP and uAutoOBP were lower than 24-hour mean BP, while in the highest BP group (systolic AuscOBP140mm Hg or diastolic AuscOBP90mm Hg), they were higher.Conclusions: Compared to uAutoOBP, attended BP measurement gives higher values, both when measured with auscultatory or oscillometric method. Inter-individual variability of AutoOBP - uAuscOBP difference, as well of uAutoOBP - ABPM difference, is large. We did not prove that uAutoOBP would be associated to 24-hour ambulatory BP more closely than attended BP.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Blood Pressure

ISSN

0803-7051

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

27

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

188-193

Kód UT WoS článku

000437328100002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85041123941