Bacteriology of deep neck infections: analysis of 634 patients

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11150%2F15%3A10295408" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11150/15:10295408 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00179906:_____/15:10295408 RIV/00843989:_____/15:E0104819

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://10.1111/adj.12325/full" target="_blank" >http://10.1111/adj.12325/full</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adj.12325" target="_blank" >10.1111/adj.12325</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Bacteriology of deep neck infections: analysis of 634 patients

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: The aim of this study was to review the bacteriology of deep neck infections (DNI) and identify the factors that influence the incidence of causative bacteria. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 634 patients with DNI was performed. Statistical analysis was used to compare the incidence of common pathogens in various conditions such as age of the patients, aetiology and associated diabetes mellitus. Results: Bacteria were isolated in 514 cultures (81%). Aerobic bacteria were isolated from 246 cultures (39%) and anaerobic bacteria from 61 cultures (10%). Both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria were isolated from 207 cultures (32%). The most common aerobic bacteria were Streptococcus pyogenes (41%) and Staphylococcus aureus (32%). The most common anaerobic bacteria were Peptostreptococcus species (28%), followed by Prevotela species (8%) and Proprionibacterium species (7%). The incidence of anaerobic bacteria was higher in adults, in patients with infections of dental origin and

Název v anglickém jazyce

Bacteriology of deep neck infections: analysis of 634 patients

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: The aim of this study was to review the bacteriology of deep neck infections (DNI) and identify the factors that influence the incidence of causative bacteria. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 634 patients with DNI was performed. Statistical analysis was used to compare the incidence of common pathogens in various conditions such as age of the patients, aetiology and associated diabetes mellitus. Results: Bacteria were isolated in 514 cultures (81%). Aerobic bacteria were isolated from 246 cultures (39%) and anaerobic bacteria from 61 cultures (10%). Both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria were isolated from 207 cultures (32%). The most common aerobic bacteria were Streptococcus pyogenes (41%) and Staphylococcus aureus (32%). The most common anaerobic bacteria were Peptostreptococcus species (28%), followed by Prevotela species (8%) and Proprionibacterium species (7%). The incidence of anaerobic bacteria was higher in adults, in patients with infections of dental origin and

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FF - ORL, oftalmologie, stomatologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Australian Dental Journal

ISSN

0045-0421

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

60

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

AU - Austrálie

Počet stran výsledku

4

Strana od-do

212-215

Kód UT WoS článku

000355227900012

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84930041051