AI-powered insights into the UniSpray ionization in supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11160%2F25%3A10505666" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11160/25:10505666 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=9bELkhstTm" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=9bELkhstTm</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2025.466064" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.chroma.2025.466064</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
AI-powered insights into the UniSpray ionization in supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Selection of the optimal makeup solvent composition is critical for achieving sensitive and reproducible ionization in supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry (SFC-MS). This study investigated the ionization processes in a spray-based ionization source called UniSpray (US), by an artificial neural network driven approach, emphasizing the effect of makeup solvent composition. A set of compounds with different physicochemical properties was analyzed using a generic SFC method and 24 makeup solvents. Artificial neural networks were used to correlate molecular descriptors with MS responses and to identify key analyte properties affecting ionization. Statistical analysis of this extensive dataset revealed significant differences in ionization efficiency compared to electrospray ionization (ESI), depending on makeup solvent composition and analyte properties. While US outperformed ESI for 82 % of compounds, certain analytes, including basic beta-blockers, fluorine-substituted compounds, and small lipophilic molecules, benefited from ESI. Optimized makeup solvent compositions differed notably between ESI and US. For example, ethanol and isopropanol were recommended for US+ but not for ESI+. The use of water and ammonia also affected MS responses differently between sources and ionization modes, with optimal concentrations varying depending on the analyte and organic modifier of the SFC mobile phase. This study highlights key differences between SFC-ESI-MS and SFC-US-MS ionization efficiency and demonstrates the utility of data-driven methodologies for faster and more efficient method development.
Název v anglickém jazyce
AI-powered insights into the UniSpray ionization in supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry
Popis výsledku anglicky
Selection of the optimal makeup solvent composition is critical for achieving sensitive and reproducible ionization in supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry (SFC-MS). This study investigated the ionization processes in a spray-based ionization source called UniSpray (US), by an artificial neural network driven approach, emphasizing the effect of makeup solvent composition. A set of compounds with different physicochemical properties was analyzed using a generic SFC method and 24 makeup solvents. Artificial neural networks were used to correlate molecular descriptors with MS responses and to identify key analyte properties affecting ionization. Statistical analysis of this extensive dataset revealed significant differences in ionization efficiency compared to electrospray ionization (ESI), depending on makeup solvent composition and analyte properties. While US outperformed ESI for 82 % of compounds, certain analytes, including basic beta-blockers, fluorine-substituted compounds, and small lipophilic molecules, benefited from ESI. Optimized makeup solvent compositions differed notably between ESI and US. For example, ethanol and isopropanol were recommended for US+ but not for ESI+. The use of water and ammonia also affected MS responses differently between sources and ionization modes, with optimal concentrations varying depending on the analyte and organic modifier of the SFC mobile phase. This study highlights key differences between SFC-ESI-MS and SFC-US-MS ionization efficiency and demonstrates the utility of data-driven methodologies for faster and more efficient method development.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30104 - Pharmacology and pharmacy
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA21-27270S" target="_blank" >GA21-27270S: Superkritická fluidní chromatografie: Výzkum fundamentálních aspektů inovativní alternativní separační techniky</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Chromatography A
ISSN
0021-9673
e-ISSN
1873-3778
Svazek periodika
1756
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
August
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
466064
Kód UT WoS článku
001504611800004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105006676501