Contents and structure of abstracts Comparison of Czech, English and Slovenian scientific journals in the area of information and materials sciences

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F13%3A10159400" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/13:10159400 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411311300093" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411311300093</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411311300093" target="_blank" >10.1108/00220411311300093</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Contents and structure of abstracts Comparison of Czech, English and Slovenian scientific journals in the area of information and materials sciences

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Purpose - Publishers of some scientific journals and the ISO standard require or recommend specific information to be present in abstracts. However, little is known whether this is what scientists give when they write abstracts. The aim of this paper isto test the structure of abstracts in Czech, Slovenian and international scientific journals in the English language in the areas of library and information science (IS) and materials science (MS). Design/methodology/approach - A total of 100 research paper abstracts were selected from each journal, and content analysis was performed both manually and using Weft QDA qualitative analysis software. Findings - The results show that neither the ISO nor the Emerald structure is entirely appropriate. Abstracts in IS usually have the following structure: Maros (CZ): background, purpose of the research project; Knjiznica (SI): background, results only indicated; Journal of Documentation: results, methods, and purpose. In MS, the abstracts usual

Název v anglickém jazyce

Contents and structure of abstracts Comparison of Czech, English and Slovenian scientific journals in the area of information and materials sciences

Popis výsledku anglicky

Purpose - Publishers of some scientific journals and the ISO standard require or recommend specific information to be present in abstracts. However, little is known whether this is what scientists give when they write abstracts. The aim of this paper isto test the structure of abstracts in Czech, Slovenian and international scientific journals in the English language in the areas of library and information science (IS) and materials science (MS). Design/methodology/approach - A total of 100 research paper abstracts were selected from each journal, and content analysis was performed both manually and using Weft QDA qualitative analysis software. Findings - The results show that neither the ISO nor the Emerald structure is entirely appropriate. Abstracts in IS usually have the following structure: Maros (CZ): background, purpose of the research project; Knjiznica (SI): background, results only indicated; Journal of Documentation: results, methods, and purpose. In MS, the abstracts usual

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AF - Dokumentace, knihovnictví, práce s informacemi

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/MEB091026" target="_blank" >MEB091026: Prezentace a hodnocení výkonnosti vědy</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Documentation

ISSN

0022-0418

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

69

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

309-319

Kód UT WoS článku

000317150200008

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—