Investigating Variation in Replicability : A "Many Labs" Replication Project
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F14%3A10290453" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/14:10290453 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.psycontent.com/content/n657m04571w51j70/fulltext.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.psycontent.com/content/n657m04571w51j70/fulltext.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178" target="_blank" >10.1027/1864-9335/a000178</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Investigating Variation in Replicability : A "Many Labs" Replication Project
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect - imagined contact reducing prejudice - showed weak support for replicability. And two effects - flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification - did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Investigating Variation in Replicability : A "Many Labs" Replication Project
Popis výsledku anglicky
Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect - imagined contact reducing prejudice - showed weak support for replicability. And two effects - flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification - did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AN - Psychologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Social Psychology
ISSN
1864-9335
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
45
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
142-152
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—