Does branching explain flow of time or the other way around?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F15%3A10285968" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/15:10285968 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-014-0638-4?sa_campaign=email/event/articleAuthor/onlineFirst" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-014-0638-4?sa_campaign=email/event/articleAuthor/onlineFirst</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0638-4" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11229-014-0638-4</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Does branching explain flow of time or the other way around?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article discusses the relation between two intuitive properties of time, namely its flow and branching. Both properties are introduced first in an informal way and compared. The conclusion of this informal analysis is that the two properties do not entail each other nor are they in contradiction. In order to verify this, we briefly introduced the branching temporal structures called branching space-time, branching continuation and their versions Minkowski branching structure and branching time withInstants. Two possible ways how to formalize flow of time are given, one based on the definition of flow of time from temporal logics and the other based on relativistic physics. The latter is used to define flow of time with the use of linearly orderedpoints on worldines while respecting the ontological definiteness given by the difference of the past and the future. This is formalized in each of the branching models and it is concluded by comparing the resulting properties that branch

Název v anglickém jazyce

Does branching explain flow of time or the other way around?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article discusses the relation between two intuitive properties of time, namely its flow and branching. Both properties are introduced first in an informal way and compared. The conclusion of this informal analysis is that the two properties do not entail each other nor are they in contradiction. In order to verify this, we briefly introduced the branching temporal structures called branching space-time, branching continuation and their versions Minkowski branching structure and branching time withInstants. Two possible ways how to formalize flow of time are given, one based on the definition of flow of time from temporal logics and the other based on relativistic physics. The latter is used to define flow of time with the use of linearly orderedpoints on worldines while respecting the ontological definiteness given by the difference of the past and the future. This is formalized in each of the branching models and it is concluded by comparing the resulting properties that branch

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Synthese

ISSN

0039-7857

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

192

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

7

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

2273-2292

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—