Institutionalization of Party Patronage in Kazakhstan

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F15%3A10296911" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/15:10296911 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.h-net.org/announce/show.cgi?ID=219561" target="_blank" >https://www.h-net.org/announce/show.cgi?ID=219561</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Institutionalization of Party Patronage in Kazakhstan

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Conventional wisdom holds that "formal institutions and organization matter". But why personalist regimes create parties and what role institutions play in the personalist regimes are still compelling research questions and are not fully understood by scholars. Moreover, does the authoritarian institution in personalist regime change longstanding patterns of behaviour, informal politics of personalist regimes, or is a institution only rubber stamp? Although the study of authoritarian regimes has recently become one of the hottest subfield in comparative politics, so far authoritarian regimes have received remarkably little scholarly attention in comparation with democratization or inner workings of democracies and so authoratitarian regimes are seen asthe black box, whose inner workings are hidden from view. Nevertheless, post-Soviet Central Asian regimes with institution-building "from scratch" could provide incredible opportunities to study institution.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Institutionalization of Party Patronage in Kazakhstan

Popis výsledku anglicky

Conventional wisdom holds that "formal institutions and organization matter". But why personalist regimes create parties and what role institutions play in the personalist regimes are still compelling research questions and are not fully understood by scholars. Moreover, does the authoritarian institution in personalist regime change longstanding patterns of behaviour, informal politics of personalist regimes, or is a institution only rubber stamp? Although the study of authoritarian regimes has recently become one of the hottest subfield in comparative politics, so far authoritarian regimes have received remarkably little scholarly attention in comparation with democratization or inner workings of democracies and so authoratitarian regimes are seen asthe black box, whose inner workings are hidden from view. Nevertheless, post-Soviet Central Asian regimes with institution-building "from scratch" could provide incredible opportunities to study institution.

Druh

M - Uspořádání konference

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Místo konání akce

Perm State University

Stát konání akce

RU - Ruská federace

Datum zahájení akce

—

Datum ukončení akce

—

Celkový počet účastníků

16

Počet zahraničních účastníků

8

Typ akce podle státní přísl. účastníků

WRD - Celosvětová akce