Dating of the Pinnacle in Square E4/5
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F16%3A10336112" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/16:10336112 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Dating of the Pinnacle in Square E4/5
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Prehistoric Troy was usually conceived as consisting of two major stages: Troy I-V and Troy VI-VII, corresponding roughly to the local EBA and the MBA/LBA, respectively. Notwithstanding certain logic behind such a division, it is sometimes necessary to treat Troy as a single body of evidence, where all data become interrelated to some degree.Whereas Troy I and II levels within the EBA citadel were still accessible to Korfmann's team for a new investigation, Troy III to V levels were potentially available only in a handful of areas, among others in the so called pinnacle in square E4/5.Thepresent paper discusses the previously presented dating for its individual strata, sets them into a wider intra-site context and suggests a considerable re-dating of the upper ones.Thepreserved pinnacle sequence thus finishes in early Troy IV and no later. In addition, Dörpfelds dating of strata outside the EBA citadel is also being reassessed, resulting in shifting the EBA sequence there to a "discovery" of so far unknown Early andMiddle Troy VI contexts. The importance of Dörpfeld's profiles lays in their being the only evidence we have when attempting a holistic phase-by-phase reconstruction of the site construction dynamics.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Dating of the Pinnacle in Square E4/5
Popis výsledku anglicky
Prehistoric Troy was usually conceived as consisting of two major stages: Troy I-V and Troy VI-VII, corresponding roughly to the local EBA and the MBA/LBA, respectively. Notwithstanding certain logic behind such a division, it is sometimes necessary to treat Troy as a single body of evidence, where all data become interrelated to some degree.Whereas Troy I and II levels within the EBA citadel were still accessible to Korfmann's team for a new investigation, Troy III to V levels were potentially available only in a handful of areas, among others in the so called pinnacle in square E4/5.Thepresent paper discusses the previously presented dating for its individual strata, sets them into a wider intra-site context and suggests a considerable re-dating of the upper ones.Thepreserved pinnacle sequence thus finishes in early Troy IV and no later. In addition, Dörpfelds dating of strata outside the EBA citadel is also being reassessed, resulting in shifting the EBA sequence there to a "discovery" of so far unknown Early andMiddle Troy VI contexts. The importance of Dörpfeld's profiles lays in their being the only evidence we have when attempting a holistic phase-by-phase reconstruction of the site construction dynamics.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
AC - Archeologie, antropologie, etnologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Early Bronze Age Troy. Chronology, Cultural Development and Interregional Contacts
ISBN
978-3-7749-3980-6
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
49-60
Název nakladatele
Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH
Místo vydání
Bonn
Místo konání akce
Tübingen
Datum konání akce
8. 5. 2009
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—