Hegel and Arendt on a Key Term of Modernity The Creativity and Destructiveness of Labor

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F16%3A10361069" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/16:10361069 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/idstudies201751555" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/idstudies201751555</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/idstudies201751555" target="_blank" >10.5840/idstudies201751555</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Hegel and Arendt on a Key Term of Modernity The Creativity and Destructiveness of Labor

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Since the early modern age, labor has gained centrality in both the social order and the conception of man. This study undertakes an attempt to evaluate this ascent by comparing the concept of labor in Hegel&apos;s thought, as presented mainly in the Phenomenology of Spirit, with the conception of labor in the thought of Hannah Arendt. While Hegel linked labor closely to spirituality, Arendt argued that in the process of labor assimilating all human activities, man in fact forfeits spirituality. The peculiar destructiveness of labor seemed to be confirmed by twentieth-century totalitarian regimes elevating labor to a unique source of values. In addition to comparing Hegel and Arendt&apos;s conceptions, the aim of this study is to ask whether Hegel&apos;s concept of labor is susceptible to the dangers inherent in the ideological conceptions of totalitarian regimes.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Hegel and Arendt on a Key Term of Modernity The Creativity and Destructiveness of Labor

Popis výsledku anglicky

Since the early modern age, labor has gained centrality in both the social order and the conception of man. This study undertakes an attempt to evaluate this ascent by comparing the concept of labor in Hegel&apos;s thought, as presented mainly in the Phenomenology of Spirit, with the conception of labor in the thought of Hannah Arendt. While Hegel linked labor closely to spirituality, Arendt argued that in the process of labor assimilating all human activities, man in fact forfeits spirituality. The peculiar destructiveness of labor seemed to be confirmed by twentieth-century totalitarian regimes elevating labor to a unique source of values. In addition to comparing Hegel and Arendt&apos;s conceptions, the aim of this study is to ask whether Hegel&apos;s concept of labor is susceptible to the dangers inherent in the ideological conceptions of totalitarian regimes.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA16-11880S" target="_blank" >GA16-11880S: Duch, příroda a společnost v klasické německé filosofii</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Idealistic Studies

ISSN

0046-8541

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

46

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

19-40

Kód UT WoS článku

000409198700002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85027241309