Who is Shaping Your Agenda? Social Network Analysis of Anti-Islam and Anti-immigration Movement Audiences on Czech Facebook

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F18%3A10389185" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/18:10389185 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65566-6_3" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65566-6_3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65566-6_3" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-65566-6_3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Who is Shaping Your Agenda? Social Network Analysis of Anti-Islam and Anti-immigration Movement Audiences on Czech Facebook

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This chapter explores the audiences of Czech anti-immigration and anti-Islamic movements&apos; pages on Facebook and analyses them through social network analysis. The public debate on the immigration crisis on Czech Facebook is highly polarized and it is fragmented into different clusters, whose audiences rarely share the same content or overlap. The chapter uses new quantitative method called Normalized Social Distance that calculates the distance between various social groups based on these groups members&apos; online behaviour. Drawing on empirical evidence, the chapter demonstrates how social network sites create echo chambers and filter bubbles, thus strengthening confirmation bias. The methods proposed in this chapter could be adopted by a variety of actors to support their research or decisions with empirical evidence.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Who is Shaping Your Agenda? Social Network Analysis of Anti-Islam and Anti-immigration Movement Audiences on Czech Facebook

Popis výsledku anglicky

This chapter explores the audiences of Czech anti-immigration and anti-Islamic movements&apos; pages on Facebook and analyses them through social network analysis. The public debate on the immigration crisis on Czech Facebook is highly polarized and it is fragmented into different clusters, whose audiences rarely share the same content or overlap. The chapter uses new quantitative method called Normalized Social Distance that calculates the distance between various social groups based on these groups members&apos; online behaviour. Drawing on empirical evidence, the chapter demonstrates how social network sites create echo chambers and filter bubbles, thus strengthening confirmation bias. The methods proposed in this chapter could be adopted by a variety of actors to support their research or decisions with empirical evidence.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50803 - Information science (social aspects)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Expressions of Radicalization: Global Politics, Processes and Practices

ISBN

978-3-319-65565-9

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

61-85

Počet stran knihy

374

Název nakladatele

Palgrave Macmillan

Místo vydání

Cham

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—