Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

EUROPE AS AN OBJECT OF DESIRE : UKRAINE BETWEEN "PSYCHOLOGICAL EUROPE" AND THE "SOVIET MENTALITY"

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F20%3A10421099" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/20:10421099 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ah13z-41PR" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ah13z-41PR</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    EUROPE AS AN OBJECT OF DESIRE : UKRAINE BETWEEN "PSYCHOLOGICAL EUROPE" AND THE "SOVIET MENTALITY"

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The article explores the idea of Europe in the Ukrainian national imaginary and its correlates in the mental patterns of contemporary Ukrainians. The conceptual tension exists between the imaginary &quot;Us&quot; (an affirmative &quot;Ukraine is Europe&quot;) and the real &quot;Us&quot; embedded in Soviet practices and mental attitudes. The main actors articulating the concept of Europe are distinguished: political elites / &quot;officials&quot;; cultural elites / &quot;intellectuals&quot;; civil society / &quot;activists&quot;; and lay citizens / &quot;electorate&quot;. It is proved that for most Ukrainians Europe is not a value-in-itself; it is an empty signifier with variable content defined by divergent agendas. For Ukrainian politicians, declarative European integration is a geopolitical tool aimed at obtaining prestige/recognition and a protective umbrella from Russia, with few repercussions on domestic policies. For cultural elites, &quot;Europe&quot; stands as a common cultural heritage, a soil breeding searches for national identity. Immanent Europeanness of the Ukrainian culture is proclaimed in the &quot;frontstage&quot; discourse, while in the &quot;backstage&quot; discourse, the lack of (self)recognition manifests itself through the symptom of being &quot;more European than Europe&quot;. Attempts &quot;to acquire ourselves via Europe&quot; are complemented with the desire &quot;to rescue Europe via acquiring ourselves&quot;. For citizens, &quot;Europe&quot; is a pathway to prosperity (&quot;to build Europe at home&quot;); yet, the content remains vague. A political struggle unfolds between the stakeholders of the captured state and public activists for the cornerston

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    EUROPE AS AN OBJECT OF DESIRE : UKRAINE BETWEEN "PSYCHOLOGICAL EUROPE" AND THE "SOVIET MENTALITY"

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The article explores the idea of Europe in the Ukrainian national imaginary and its correlates in the mental patterns of contemporary Ukrainians. The conceptual tension exists between the imaginary &quot;Us&quot; (an affirmative &quot;Ukraine is Europe&quot;) and the real &quot;Us&quot; embedded in Soviet practices and mental attitudes. The main actors articulating the concept of Europe are distinguished: political elites / &quot;officials&quot;; cultural elites / &quot;intellectuals&quot;; civil society / &quot;activists&quot;; and lay citizens / &quot;electorate&quot;. It is proved that for most Ukrainians Europe is not a value-in-itself; it is an empty signifier with variable content defined by divergent agendas. For Ukrainian politicians, declarative European integration is a geopolitical tool aimed at obtaining prestige/recognition and a protective umbrella from Russia, with few repercussions on domestic policies. For cultural elites, &quot;Europe&quot; stands as a common cultural heritage, a soil breeding searches for national identity. Immanent Europeanness of the Ukrainian culture is proclaimed in the &quot;frontstage&quot; discourse, while in the &quot;backstage&quot; discourse, the lack of (self)recognition manifests itself through the symptom of being &quot;more European than Europe&quot;. Attempts &quot;to acquire ourselves via Europe&quot; are complemented with the desire &quot;to rescue Europe via acquiring ourselves&quot;. For citizens, &quot;Europe&quot; is a pathway to prosperity (&quot;to build Europe at home&quot;); yet, the content remains vague. A political struggle unfolds between the stakeholders of the captured state and public activists for the cornerston

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50401 - Sociology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Topos

  • ISSN

    1815-0047

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    2020

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    LT - Litevská republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    21

  • Strana od-do

    79-99

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus