Two Ovidian Miscellanies: Ovid's Contribution to the History of Literature and the Historicity of his Exile
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F21%3A10437217" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/21:10437217 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=LajjWH6XNZ" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=LajjWH6XNZ</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Two Ovidian Miscellanies: Ovid's Contribution to the History of Literature and the Historicity of his Exile
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper deals with two minor Ovidian issues. Ovid's reference to Antony and Brutus' literary writings is argued not to have necessarily pointed to all of them, but only those could have been in Ovid's mind in which invectives against Octavian were contained. At least two late antique accounts of Ovid's exile certainly come from Suetonius' De poetis. This is not a mere supposition: it can be convincingly argued for. Hence the thesis that Ovid's exile was a fiction must eventually be defended allowing that even Suetonius could have been mistaken about its historicity, or the facts called to attention here must be explained away. In the Epitome de Caesaribus perhaps even the content of the edict imposing on Ovid his banishment may be mirrored, but this cannot be proved likewise sufficiently.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Two Ovidian Miscellanies: Ovid's Contribution to the History of Literature and the Historicity of his Exile
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper deals with two minor Ovidian issues. Ovid's reference to Antony and Brutus' literary writings is argued not to have necessarily pointed to all of them, but only those could have been in Ovid's mind in which invectives against Octavian were contained. At least two late antique accounts of Ovid's exile certainly come from Suetonius' De poetis. This is not a mere supposition: it can be convincingly argued for. Hence the thesis that Ovid's exile was a fiction must eventually be defended allowing that even Suetonius could have been mistaken about its historicity, or the facts called to attention here must be explained away. In the Epitome de Caesaribus perhaps even the content of the edict imposing on Ovid his banishment may be mirrored, but this cannot be proved likewise sufficiently.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60205 - Literary theory
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Rheinisches Museum fuer Philologie
ISSN
0035-449X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
164
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3-4
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
28
Strana od-do
367-394
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—