Poloostrov Krym: od křižovatky kultur k ruské kolonii

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F22%3A10455454" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/22:10455454 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

čeština

Název v původním jazyce

Poloostrov Krym: od křižovatky kultur k ruské kolonii

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The study attempts to trace the main discourse of Crimea in Ukrainian and Russian media after the beginning of the so-called Crimean crisis and the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation in March 2014. The discourse is based on mapping a few popular news websites on both sides of the Ukraini- an-Russian border: Pravda.com.ua, 24.tv.ua, Segodnya.ua, Interfax.ru, Ria.ru and Lenta.ru. In the study several particular cases and their interpretations are exam- ined: the so-called referendum and the annexation of Crimea; the ethnic minority of the Crimean Tatars; the tourist movement in Crimea; the Crimean bridge; the economic sanctions introduced because of the annexation of Crimea. In each of these cases opposite discourses are evident: the Russian media discourse is based on the official interpretation of Crimea as a historical and cultural part of &quot;Russia&apos;s world&quot;, with an emphasis put on the strategical importance of the peninsula. The Ukrainian approach is mainly based on the illegality of the annexation and an em- phasis is laid on the juridical aspect of every topic in the Crimean context. These discourses are rather stable throughout the period of 2014-2019.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Image of Crimea in Ukrainian and Russian Media

Popis výsledku anglicky

The study attempts to trace the main discourse of Crimea in Ukrainian and Russian media after the beginning of the so-called Crimean crisis and the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation in March 2014. The discourse is based on mapping a few popular news websites on both sides of the Ukraini- an-Russian border: Pravda.com.ua, 24.tv.ua, Segodnya.ua, Interfax.ru, Ria.ru and Lenta.ru. In the study several particular cases and their interpretations are exam- ined: the so-called referendum and the annexation of Crimea; the ethnic minority of the Crimean Tatars; the tourist movement in Crimea; the Crimean bridge; the economic sanctions introduced because of the annexation of Crimea. In each of these cases opposite discourses are evident: the Russian media discourse is based on the official interpretation of Crimea as a historical and cultural part of &quot;Russia&apos;s world&quot;, with an emphasis put on the strategical importance of the peninsula. The Ukrainian approach is mainly based on the illegality of the annexation and an em- phasis is laid on the juridical aspect of every topic in the Crimean context. These discourses are rather stable throughout the period of 2014-2019.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60500 - Other Humanities and the Arts

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Poloostrov Krym: od křižovatky kultur k ruské kolonii

ISBN

978-80-86420-85-1

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

335-349

Počet stran knihy

384

Název nakladatele

Slovanský ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.

Místo vydání

Praha

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—