Coalition Maintenance during Democratization: Comparative Insights from Tunisia and Yemen
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F23%3A10458645" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/23:10458645 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=x0lR5W6rwm" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=x0lR5W6rwm</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18763375-20231398" target="_blank" >10.1163/18763375-20231398</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Coalition Maintenance during Democratization: Comparative Insights from Tunisia and Yemen
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In light of the oft-cited benefits of power sharing, this paper compares two cases of coalition governments that emerged from domestically initiated transition processes in the Arab world: the Tunisian Troika (2011-2014) and the Yemeni Coalition Government (1993-1994). While the former facilitated Tunisia's democratization, the latter's disintegration contributed to the 1994 war and Yemen's authoritarian backsliding. It asks why coalition cooperation endured in Tunisia but not in Yemen, exploring intra-elite relations, the power dynamics at play, as well as elites' motivations in launching and maintaining cooperation. The paper reveals that both coalitions' internal functioning was hampered by adverse power configurations and ideological differences. In Yemen, intra-elite relations were further impaired by mutual distrust. Crucially, a history of sustained partnership along with normative commitment to the idea of power sharing, existent in Tunisia and not in Yemen, explains why cooperation within the Troika remained solid amid unfavorable circumstances.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Coalition Maintenance during Democratization: Comparative Insights from Tunisia and Yemen
Popis výsledku anglicky
In light of the oft-cited benefits of power sharing, this paper compares two cases of coalition governments that emerged from domestically initiated transition processes in the Arab world: the Tunisian Troika (2011-2014) and the Yemeni Coalition Government (1993-1994). While the former facilitated Tunisia's democratization, the latter's disintegration contributed to the 1994 war and Yemen's authoritarian backsliding. It asks why coalition cooperation endured in Tunisia but not in Yemen, exploring intra-elite relations, the power dynamics at play, as well as elites' motivations in launching and maintaining cooperation. The paper reveals that both coalitions' internal functioning was hampered by adverse power configurations and ideological differences. In Yemen, intra-elite relations were further impaired by mutual distrust. Crucially, a history of sustained partnership along with normative commitment to the idea of power sharing, existent in Tunisia and not in Yemen, explains why cooperation within the Troika remained solid amid unfavorable circumstances.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60500 - Other Humanities and the Arts
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Middle East Law and Governance
ISSN
1876-3375
e-ISSN
1876-3375
Svazek periodika
2023
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
Neuveden
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
24
Strana od-do
1-24
Kód UT WoS článku
001092188300005
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85152908975