Papal designations in the context of the Gregorian Reform

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F23%3A10472440" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/23:10472440 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=H1aHKqKcq2" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=H1aHKqKcq2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31743/spw.16346" target="_blank" >10.31743/spw.16346</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Papal designations in the context of the Gregorian Reform

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This study looks at a specific aspect of papal elections during the Gregorian Reform: papal designation.In separate steps, the study endeavours to look at both the historical and developmental contextof papal designation, as well as the use of papal nomination for individual elections that took place duringthe Gregorian Reform period. The text also uses an analysis of electoral procedures to evaluate the significanceof designation, specifically its actual influence on the decisions made by electoral participants.The designation does not appear to be a procedural and legislative feature but instead more of a practicaland legitimising tool for defending a chosen procedure.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Papal designations in the context of the Gregorian Reform

Popis výsledku anglicky

This study looks at a specific aspect of papal elections during the Gregorian Reform: papal designation.In separate steps, the study endeavours to look at both the historical and developmental contextof papal designation, as well as the use of papal nomination for individual elections that took place duringthe Gregorian Reform period. The text also uses an analysis of electoral procedures to evaluate the significanceof designation, specifically its actual influence on the decisions made by electoral participants.The designation does not appear to be a procedural and legislative feature but instead more of a practicaland legitimising tool for defending a chosen procedure.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studies in Law on Religion

ISSN

2081-8882

e-ISSN

2544-3003

Svazek periodika

26

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Neuveden

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

171-187

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85183400364