Accusative pronominal clitics ju and je in Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian: a contrastive corpus study of standard and colloquial varieties

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F23%3A10479010" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/23:10479010 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=7F4qv8k4y4" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=7F4qv8k4y4</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.29162/jez.2023.2" target="_blank" >10.29162/jez.2023.2</a>

Jazyk výsledku

chorvatština

Název v původním jazyce

Akuzativne zamjeničke zanaglasnice ju i je u bosanskome, hrvatskome i srpskome: kontrastivno korpusno istraživanje standardnih i razgovornih idioma

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Empirijske studije o varijacijama u korištenju klitika gotovo u potpunosti nedostaju. Međutim, pažljiva kontrastivna analiza gramatika BHS-a i priručnika s jezičnim savjetnicima ukazuje na razlike u korištenju klitika ne samo između standardnih varijanti BHS-a nego i unutar njihovih kolokvijalnih varijanti. Ovaj se rad posebno bavi varijacijama u korištenju akuzativa ženskog roda u trećem licu CL ju i je &apos;ona&apos;. Prema dosadašnjoj literaturi, upotreba CL varijante ju ograničenija je u bosanskom i srpskom nego u hrvatskom standardu (usp. Silić &amp; Pranjković 2007; Mrazović &amp; Vukadinović 2009; Ridjanović 2012; Piper &amp; Klajn 2014).Kako bismo testirali raspon ove varijacije, okrećemo se ne samo tradicionalno sastavljenim referentnim korpusima s jezičnim materijalom koji bi trebao odražavati standardne BHS varijante (Santos 1998; Utvić 2011; Čermák &amp; Rosen 2012; Brozović Rončević et al. 2018) nego i {bs ,hr,sr}WaC, tri masivna web korpusa (Ljubešić &amp; Klubička 2014) dostupna putem jedinstvenog, funkcionalnog sučelja NoSketchEngine, s morfosintaktičkom anotacijom temeljenom na zajedničkom tagsetu. Ručno smo označili 3.916 podatkovnih točaka s CL varijantama ju i je. Ova studija pokazuje kako nam jezični korpusi mogu dati vrijedne uvide u raspon varijacija ne samo u standardnim varijantama BHS-a nego iu stvarnoj jezičnoj uporabi, tj. njihovim kolokvijalnim varijantama kroz učestalost oblika i obrazaca koje BHS djelomično odbacuje. normativisti.Generalizirani linearni regresijski model otkrio je statistički značajne razlike u uporabi CL ju između standardne hrvatske varijante s jedne strane i standardnog bosanskog i srpskog jezika s druge strane. Također je pokazalo da se BCS kolokvijalne varijante značajno razlikuju u pogledu distribucije CL varijante ju. Nadalje, naši su podaci pokazali da se distribucija CL varijante ju značajno razlikuje u standardnim i kolokvijalnim varijantama analiziranih jezika. Konačno, na temelju našeg modela generalizirane linearne regresije, pokazali smo da -(j)u završetak CL hosta ima značajan utjecaj na izbor između CL varijanti ju i je: smanjuje vjerojatnost upotrebe ju.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Accusative pronominal clitics ju and je in Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian: a contrastive corpus study of standard and colloquial varieties

Popis výsledku anglicky

Empirical studies on variation in clitic use are almost entirely lacking. However, a careful contrastive analysis of both BCS grammar books and language advisor handbooks indicates differences in the usage of clitics not only between BCS standard varieties but also within their colloquial varieties. This paper deals specifically with variation in usage of the third-person feminine accusative CL ju and je &apos;her&apos;. According to the previous literature, the usage of the CL variant ju is more limited in Bosnian and Serbian than in Croatian standard (cf. Silić &amp; Pranjković 2007; Mrazović &amp; Vukadinović 2009; Ridjanović 2012; Piper &amp; Klajn 2014). To test the range of this variation, we turn not only to traditionally compiled reference corpora with language material that should reflect standard BCS varieties (Santos 1998; Utvić 2011; Čermák &amp; Rosen 2012; Brozović Rončević et al. 2018) but also to {bs,hr,sr}WaC, three massive web corpora (Ljubešić &amp; Klubička 2014) available via a unified, functional interface NoSketchEngine, with morphosyntactic annotation based on the common tagset. We manually annotated 3.916 data points with CL variants ju and je. This study shows how language corpora can give us valuable insights into the range of variation not only in the BCS standard varieties but also in the real language use, i.e., their colloquial varieties through the frequency of forms and patterns which are partially discarded by the BCS normativists. The generalized linear regression model revealed statistically significant differences in the usage of the CL ju between the standard Croatian variety on the one hand, and standard Bosnian and Serbian on the other. It also showed that BCS colloquial varieties differ significantly concerning the distribution of the CL variant ju. Furthermore, our data showed that the distribution of the CL variant ju is significantly different in standard and colloquial varieties of analyzed languages. Finally, based on our generalized linear regression model, we showed that the -(j)u ending of the CL host has a significant impact on the choice between the CL variants ju and je: it decreases the probability of the ju usage.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60203 - Linguistics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Jezikoslovlje

ISSN

1331-7202

e-ISSN

1848-9001

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

HR - Chorvatská republika

Počet stran výsledku

52

Strana od-do

27-78

Kód UT WoS článku

001043892100002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85170517743