THE FIRST PAPAL ELECTION ACCORDING TO THE DECREE IN NOMINE DOMINI

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F25%3A10496958" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/25:10496958 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=yaM0C1X_OR" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=yaM0C1X_OR</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

THE FIRST PAPAL ELECTION ACCORDING TO THE DECREE IN NOMINE DOMINI

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

It analyses contemporary sources, particularly the Monte Cassino Chronicle and post-election announcements, to ask when this decree was first used in practice and under what circumstances. The main focus is on Pope Urban II&apos;s election, which has several essential features that coincide with the In nomine Domini decree provisions. The study makes a detailed comparison of the procedure used in the choice between contemporary sources and the text of the decree, to show that they did indeed coincide in the major features of the procedure. In addition, it focuses on the internal and external criticism of the sources, dealing primarily with possible later modifications and contradictions. The result is not only a confirmation of Urban II&apos;s election as an exceptional act, which deliberately used Nicholas II&apos;s decree to select a new pope but also a subsequent evaluation of the reasons why the electors preferred such a procedure.

Název v anglickém jazyce

THE FIRST PAPAL ELECTION ACCORDING TO THE DECREE IN NOMINE DOMINI

Popis výsledku anglicky

It analyses contemporary sources, particularly the Monte Cassino Chronicle and post-election announcements, to ask when this decree was first used in practice and under what circumstances. The main focus is on Pope Urban II&apos;s election, which has several essential features that coincide with the In nomine Domini decree provisions. The study makes a detailed comparison of the procedure used in the choice between contemporary sources and the text of the decree, to show that they did indeed coincide in the major features of the procedure. In addition, it focuses on the internal and external criticism of the sources, dealing primarily with possible later modifications and contradictions. The result is not only a confirmation of Urban II&apos;s election as an exceptional act, which deliberately used Nicholas II&apos;s decree to select a new pope but also a subsequent evaluation of the reasons why the electors preferred such a procedure.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Journal of Science and Theology

ISSN

1841-0464

e-ISSN

1842-8517

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

RO - Rumunsko

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

1-16

Kód UT WoS článku

001439580100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-86000353842