Between Two Legal Orders: A Relativist Doctrine for a Member State Constitutional Court?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F10%3A10053269" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/10:10053269 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Between Two Legal Orders: A Relativist Doctrine for a Member State Constitutional Court?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper deals with two intertwined processes ? with the formation of the Czech Constitutional Court?s doctrine on the relationship between Czech constitutional law and European law, on the one hand, and, on the other, with the simultaneous developmentof the Court?s own role under the new circumstances where it is faced with two interconnected and to a certain extent, independent legal orders in its jurisdiction. In order to be able to determine the essential features of these processes, we have selected two decisions of the Court and analyzed them in-depth. First, we present the Court?s positioning. Second, we critically analyze the essential components of the Court?s European doctrine (ad II). Finally, we identify the origins for the Court?s confusion and suggest that it should adopt a relativist approach to deal with conflicts between the two legal orders, both substantially and procedurally (ad III).

Název v anglickém jazyce

Between Two Legal Orders: A Relativist Doctrine for a Member State Constitutional Court?

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper deals with two intertwined processes ? with the formation of the Czech Constitutional Court?s doctrine on the relationship between Czech constitutional law and European law, on the one hand, and, on the other, with the simultaneous developmentof the Court?s own role under the new circumstances where it is faced with two interconnected and to a certain extent, independent legal orders in its jurisdiction. In order to be able to determine the essential features of these processes, we have selected two decisions of the Court and analyzed them in-depth. First, we present the Court?s positioning. Second, we critically analyze the essential components of the Court?s European doctrine (ad II). Finally, we identify the origins for the Court?s confusion and suggest that it should adopt a relativist approach to deal with conflicts between the two legal orders, both substantially and procedurally (ad III).

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/IAA701020902" target="_blank" >IAA701020902: Vynucování evropského práva ve dvanácti nových členských státech: Řízení o předběžné otázce a řízení o porušení smlouvy 2004-2010</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Europe. The New Legal Realism. Essays in Honour of Hjalte Rasmussen

ISBN

978-87-574-2482-9

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

—

Počet stran knihy

860

Název nakladatele

DJ?F Forlag

Místo vydání

Copenhagen

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—