Antitrust Supervision of the Regulatory Activities of Public Bodies: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F14%3A10289777" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/14:10289777 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.icc.qmul.ac.uk/docs/gar2014/146226.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.icc.qmul.ac.uk/docs/gar2014/146226.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Antitrust Supervision of the Regulatory Activities of Public Bodies: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Articles 101 and 102 TFEU apply to public bodies executing regulatory and administrative tasks only in connection with other provisions of EU Treaties. Their applicability is therefore limited. However, these activities may be scrutinised under the domestic competition laws of some EU Member States whose national competition authorities have specific legal instruments at their disposal applicable to public bodies beyond their classical advocacy or consultation powers. Those competition authorities can commence administrative proceedings and even impose a fine for anticompetitive practices. This article aims to discuss the relevant competition law provisions of selected EU countries regarding the activities of their public bodies. The US approach to antitrust liability of public bodies, notably municipalities, will also be taken into account with a focus on state action immunity doctrine. Lastly, the question of whether public bodies carrying out their conventional tasks are entitled to

Název v anglickém jazyce

Antitrust Supervision of the Regulatory Activities of Public Bodies: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Articles 101 and 102 TFEU apply to public bodies executing regulatory and administrative tasks only in connection with other provisions of EU Treaties. Their applicability is therefore limited. However, these activities may be scrutinised under the domestic competition laws of some EU Member States whose national competition authorities have specific legal instruments at their disposal applicable to public bodies beyond their classical advocacy or consultation powers. Those competition authorities can commence administrative proceedings and even impose a fine for anticompetitive practices. This article aims to discuss the relevant competition law provisions of selected EU countries regarding the activities of their public bodies. The US approach to antitrust liability of public bodies, notably municipalities, will also be taken into account with a focus on state action immunity doctrine. Lastly, the question of whether public bodies carrying out their conventional tasks are entitled to

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů