Armed Opposition Groups and Shared Responsibility

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F15%3A10319258" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/15:10319258 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/48546054:_____/15:#0001444

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Armed Opposition Groups and Shared Responsibility

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Modern armed conflicts are characterised by numerous interactions between armed opposition groups and other actors (states, international organisations, other non-state actors etc.). Some of these interactions result in harmful outcomes that cannot be easily attributed to a single actor. Issues of shared responsibility thus arise. Such issues have so far been largely ignored in international law. This article argues that the legal regime of shared responsibility applicable to armed opposition groups could be construed in two ways. On the one hand, it would be possible to extend to armed opposition groups rules of (shared) responsibility for internationally wrongful acts which apply to states. On the other hand, the legal regime could be based on liability (strict responsibility), or on standard-setting. The article shows that all these options have certain limitations stemming from the specific features of armed opposition groups (limited legitimacy, internal diversity, and temporary e

Název v anglickém jazyce

Armed Opposition Groups and Shared Responsibility

Popis výsledku anglicky

Modern armed conflicts are characterised by numerous interactions between armed opposition groups and other actors (states, international organisations, other non-state actors etc.). Some of these interactions result in harmful outcomes that cannot be easily attributed to a single actor. Issues of shared responsibility thus arise. Such issues have so far been largely ignored in international law. This article argues that the legal regime of shared responsibility applicable to armed opposition groups could be construed in two ways. On the one hand, it would be possible to extend to armed opposition groups rules of (shared) responsibility for internationally wrongful acts which apply to states. On the other hand, the legal regime could be based on liability (strict responsibility), or on standard-setting. The article shows that all these options have certain limitations stemming from the specific features of armed opposition groups (limited legitimacy, internal diversity, and temporary e

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Netherlands National Law Review

ISSN

0165-070X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

62

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

69-89

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84935864853