GUARANTEED MINIMUM INCOME FOR ALL: A CASE OF THE EU AND EEA

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F16%3A10325332" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/16:10325332 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/issue/view/224/showToc" target="_blank" >http://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/issue/view/224/showToc</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

GUARANTEED MINIMUM INCOME FOR ALL: A CASE OF THE EU AND EEA

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

For the European Union, the question, the Future of Social Security Law, comes at critical moment: the natural tendency for creation new barriers that is inherent for each national welfare state as an international threshold of inequity has been even enhanced by pending European integration. All mature European welfare states are restrictive and every nation has filters which separates out desirable migrants in terms of their labour market potential. This article proves that neither old member states, nor the new ones exception are an exception. In our comparison, German social assistance scheme (especially the special Law on Social Benefits for Asylum-Seekers) guarantees, thanks to the active Constitutional Court, better positions for migrants than respective Czech laws. Even so, German laws set forth enough protective clauses to being able marginalised asylum-seekers as in the Czech Republic or any other member state of the EEA.

Název v anglickém jazyce

GUARANTEED MINIMUM INCOME FOR ALL: A CASE OF THE EU AND EEA

Popis výsledku anglicky

For the European Union, the question, the Future of Social Security Law, comes at critical moment: the natural tendency for creation new barriers that is inherent for each national welfare state as an international threshold of inequity has been even enhanced by pending European integration. All mature European welfare states are restrictive and every nation has filters which separates out desirable migrants in terms of their labour market potential. This article proves that neither old member states, nor the new ones exception are an exception. In our comparison, German social assistance scheme (especially the special Law on Social Benefits for Asylum-Seekers) guarantees, thanks to the active Constitutional Court, better positions for migrants than respective Czech laws. Even so, German laws set forth enough protective clauses to being able marginalised asylum-seekers as in the Czech Republic or any other member state of the EEA.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law

ISSN

2179-7943

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

BR - Brazilská federativní republika

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

477-492

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—