Third Party to Pick up the Bill? Costs Issues Relating to Third Party Funding in Investment Arbitration

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F16%3A10329860" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/16:10329860 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://rozkotova.cld.bz/rww/CYIL-vol-7-20161/424" target="_blank" >https://rozkotova.cld.bz/rww/CYIL-vol-7-20161/424</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Third Party to Pick up the Bill? Costs Issues Relating to Third Party Funding in Investment Arbitration

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article assesses the recent development of third party funding in international investment arbitration and its influence on rules governing costs, specifically security for costs and allocation of costs. Third party funding has recently become a widespread practice in the area of investment disputes since the costs of the disputes keep rising. Tribunals in investment arbitrations face difficult questions when one of the parties to the dispute is funded by a third party. The involvement of a third party funder can, especially in terms of security for costs and allocation of costs, play a significant role. The authors of this article focus, in the absence of explicit provisions in investment protection treaties, on the current practice of tribunals. The authors conclude that the regulation has not yet caught up with the growing practice of cost issues in regards to third party funding and, although an intense debate has begun, the question of the specific form and extent of the regulation is yet to be settled.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Third Party to Pick up the Bill? Costs Issues Relating to Third Party Funding in Investment Arbitration

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article assesses the recent development of third party funding in international investment arbitration and its influence on rules governing costs, specifically security for costs and allocation of costs. Third party funding has recently become a widespread practice in the area of investment disputes since the costs of the disputes keep rising. Tribunals in investment arbitrations face difficult questions when one of the parties to the dispute is funded by a third party. The involvement of a third party funder can, especially in terms of security for costs and allocation of costs, play a significant role. The authors of this article focus, in the absence of explicit provisions in investment protection treaties, on the current practice of tribunals. The authors conclude that the regulation has not yet caught up with the growing practice of cost issues in regards to third party funding and, although an intense debate has begun, the question of the specific form and extent of the regulation is yet to be settled.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, česká ročenka mezinárodního práva veřejného a soukromého

ISSN

1805-0565

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2016

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

7

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

411-419

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—