The Human Embryo in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F16%3A10330756" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/16:10330756 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://ejournal41.com/journals_n/1485875971.pdf" target="_blank" >http://ejournal41.com/journals_n/1485875971.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Human Embryo in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper presents an analysis of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the status of a human embryo. At the beginning, the author makes an overview of the legal documents on the subject-matter produced by intergovernmental organisations on both universal and regional levels. The overview covers also a national legislation of Australia, China, Japan, United States and most of the European states. Further the paper elaborates on the decisions and judgments of the European Court adopted for the last fifty five years. The summary of this case-law is provided in a chronological order from the oldest to the newest one. Finally, the author comments on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights with regard to the issue of the human embryo legal position. The case-law in question certifies that human embryo cannot be considered "a thing", but at the same time it is still not "a person" for the purposes of the Article 2 of the Convention.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Human Embryo in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights.

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper presents an analysis of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the status of a human embryo. At the beginning, the author makes an overview of the legal documents on the subject-matter produced by intergovernmental organisations on both universal and regional levels. The overview covers also a national legislation of Australia, China, Japan, United States and most of the European states. Further the paper elaborates on the decisions and judgments of the European Court adopted for the last fifty five years. The summary of this case-law is provided in a chronological order from the oldest to the newest one. Finally, the author comments on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights with regard to the issue of the human embryo legal position. The case-law in question certifies that human embryo cannot be considered "a thing", but at the same time it is still not "a person" for the purposes of the Article 2 of the Convention.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Russian Journal of Comparative Law

ISSN

2411-7994

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

RU - Ruská federace

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

140-153

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—