On the Choice of Methods of Transposition of EU Directives

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F16%3A10331245" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/16:10331245 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

On the Choice of Methods of Transposition of EU Directives

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article scrutinises the freedom of choice of Member States regarding methods of transposition of EU directives. It is argued that this freedom is significantly limited and that its limits are influenced by several factors, which have their origin in both EU law and the national legal systems of Member States. The article identifies and assesses these factors. The analysis focuses on the main methods of transposition of EU directives: copying, elaboration, minimalistic transposition and gold-plating. The aim is to design a comprehensive systematic framework within which the choice of transposition methods and the real limits of this choice can be conceptualised. The article stresses that, owing to a number of limiting factors, the choice between the main methods of transposition can never be exercised in a mechanical manner. The choice has to be based, instead, on a systematic and targeted analysis of the content of the directive concerned, relevant national laws, as well as directly applicable EU acts. The article also points out that the choice between available methods of transposition often involves an important policy choice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

On the Choice of Methods of Transposition of EU Directives

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article scrutinises the freedom of choice of Member States regarding methods of transposition of EU directives. It is argued that this freedom is significantly limited and that its limits are influenced by several factors, which have their origin in both EU law and the national legal systems of Member States. The article identifies and assesses these factors. The analysis focuses on the main methods of transposition of EU directives: copying, elaboration, minimalistic transposition and gold-plating. The aim is to design a comprehensive systematic framework within which the choice of transposition methods and the real limits of this choice can be conceptualised. The article stresses that, owing to a number of limiting factors, the choice between the main methods of transposition can never be exercised in a mechanical manner. The choice has to be based, instead, on a systematic and targeted analysis of the content of the directive concerned, relevant national laws, as well as directly applicable EU acts. The article also points out that the choice between available methods of transposition often involves an important policy choice.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Law Review

ISSN

0307-5400

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

41

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

220-242

Kód UT WoS článku

000373991600005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—