Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Fall of State Immunity from Execution in France: Let the States Beware

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F16%3A10338093" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/16:10338093 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Fall of State Immunity from Execution in France: Let the States Beware

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This article comments on the French Supreme Court's decision, Commisimpex v. République du Congo, dated May 13, 2015, related to the scope of waivers of state immunity from execution. The court decided that an express waiver of immunity was enough to execute on bank accounts of foreign states' diplomatic missions and abandoned its former requirement that a waiver must be both express and specific to execute on such assets. This decision thus marked a surprise reversal by the court of its earlier 2011 and 2013 decisions, which reinforced state immunity from execution, traditionally referred to as "the last bastion of State immunity." In wake of the Commisimpex decision, this last bastion had fallen in presence of an express waiver of state immunity from execution in France. The author analyzes the reasons for the reversal and explores the consequences of the Commisimpex decision for both states and their creditors, as well as the decision's potential impact on the famous Creighton jurisprudence, by which the French Supreme Court deemed a state's agreement to arbitrate to constitute a waiver of its immunity from execution. The Commisimpex decision was a blow to state immunity from execution in France. But will "that which does not kill it make it stronger"? Depending on states' behavior and the fate of the Creighton jurisprudence, state immunity from execution might become stronger than ever before.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Fall of State Immunity from Execution in France: Let the States Beware

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This article comments on the French Supreme Court's decision, Commisimpex v. République du Congo, dated May 13, 2015, related to the scope of waivers of state immunity from execution. The court decided that an express waiver of immunity was enough to execute on bank accounts of foreign states' diplomatic missions and abandoned its former requirement that a waiver must be both express and specific to execute on such assets. This decision thus marked a surprise reversal by the court of its earlier 2011 and 2013 decisions, which reinforced state immunity from execution, traditionally referred to as "the last bastion of State immunity." In wake of the Commisimpex decision, this last bastion had fallen in presence of an express waiver of state immunity from execution in France. The author analyzes the reasons for the reversal and explores the consequences of the Commisimpex decision for both states and their creditors, as well as the decision's potential impact on the famous Creighton jurisprudence, by which the French Supreme Court deemed a state's agreement to arbitrate to constitute a waiver of its immunity from execution. The Commisimpex decision was a blow to state immunity from execution in France. But will "that which does not kill it make it stronger"? Depending on states' behavior and the fate of the Creighton jurisprudence, state immunity from execution might become stronger than ever before.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

  • CEP obor

    AG - Právní vědy

  • OECD FORD obor

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2016

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    International Arbitration Law Review

  • ISSN

    1367-8272

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    19

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    5

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    133-139

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus