Can Positive Obligations of States Serve as a Remedy for Human Rights Violations Committed by Juristic Persons?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F18%3A10374737" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/18:10374737 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.v19i1.16511" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.v19i1.16511</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18593/ejjl.v19i1.16511" target="_blank" >10.18593/ejjl.v19i1.16511</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Can Positive Obligations of States Serve as a Remedy for Human Rights Violations Committed by Juristic Persons?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Positive obligations of States to protect and implement human rights are considered a part of various effects of human rights in legislations. In this article, it is argued that a crucial problem arises from the inconsistent practice of addressing violations of human rights committed by juristic persons together with a lack of underlying general theory of liability for human rights violations committed by private entities. Without a major change in the legal doctrine and case-law, we will need to remain focused on the role of the State as a guarantor of human rights, rather than on the imposition of human rights obligations on private-law entities. In this article, it is argued that the nature of the relationship between a juristic person and the State is not the only relevant aspect, as we should also examine the activity of the juristic person in question.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Can Positive Obligations of States Serve as a Remedy for Human Rights Violations Committed by Juristic Persons?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Positive obligations of States to protect and implement human rights are considered a part of various effects of human rights in legislations. In this article, it is argued that a crucial problem arises from the inconsistent practice of addressing violations of human rights committed by juristic persons together with a lack of underlying general theory of liability for human rights violations committed by private entities. Without a major change in the legal doctrine and case-law, we will need to remain focused on the role of the State as a guarantor of human rights, rather than on the imposition of human rights obligations on private-law entities. In this article, it is argued that the nature of the relationship between a juristic person and the State is not the only relevant aspect, as we should also examine the activity of the juristic person in question.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA16-22016S" target="_blank" >GA16-22016S: Právní jednání a odpovědnost právnických osob</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [online]

ISSN

2179-7943

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

BR - Brazilská federativní republika

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

45-59

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—