Case Law and Precedent in Continental and Anglo-American Law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F18%3A10393881" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/18:10393881 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Case Law and Precedent in Continental and Anglo-American Law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

England and other common law culture countries have, since the 19th century, been built on the doctrine of binding precedent - a single decision of the supreme court whose conclusions generally bind the court itself as well as all lower courts. On the contrary, in Continental Europe, legal theory has promoted, since the 19th century, the opinion that court decisions are no source of law and cannot be binding. As much as the gap between the originally radically different concepts of continental and Anglo-American law has appreciably narrowed over the course of two centuries, evident differences between the two concepts still prevail. Most standard legal theory and methodology textbooks in continental countries deny that decisions of higher courts would be generally binding or operate as precedents.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Case Law and Precedent in Continental and Anglo-American Law

Popis výsledku anglicky

England and other common law culture countries have, since the 19th century, been built on the doctrine of binding precedent - a single decision of the supreme court whose conclusions generally bind the court itself as well as all lower courts. On the contrary, in Continental Europe, legal theory has promoted, since the 19th century, the opinion that court decisions are no source of law and cannot be binding. As much as the gap between the originally radically different concepts of continental and Anglo-American law has appreciably narrowed over the course of two centuries, evident differences between the two concepts still prevail. Most standard legal theory and methodology textbooks in continental countries deny that decisions of higher courts would be generally binding or operate as precedents.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Binding Effect of Judicial Decisions - National and International Perspectives

ISBN

978-94-035-0372-1

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

31-48

Počet stran knihy

303

Název nakladatele

Kluwer Law International

Místo vydání

Alphen aan den Rijn

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—