Two faces of "international administrative law"

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F19%3A10395413" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/19:10395413 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=CYhzx_PCcf" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=CYhzx_PCcf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Two faces of "international administrative law"

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The term &quot;international administrative law&quot; (diritto amministrativo internazionale, droit administratif international, internationales Verwaltungsrecht) remains an enigma of public law. Since the 1900s, the term has been traditionally understood in two different ways. On one hand, some authors (J. Gascon y Marin, P. Kazansky, A, Rapisardi-Mirabelli) used this term regarding the administrative competencies of those various &quot;international administrative unions&quot;. On the other hand, other authors (P. Fedozzi, K. Neumeyer, G. Biscottini) used the term to exclusively refer to the norms of national administrative law, which address certain foreign elements; i.e. as a parallel to the discipline of international private law. This article deals with these two different understandings of &quot;international administrative law&quot; and with their impact for recent developments in legal scholarship. The article also addresses currently renewed interest in the &quot;international administrative law&quot; and its consequences for the newly established doctrine of &quot;global administrative law&quot;.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Two faces of "international administrative law"

Popis výsledku anglicky

The term &quot;international administrative law&quot; (diritto amministrativo internazionale, droit administratif international, internationales Verwaltungsrecht) remains an enigma of public law. Since the 1900s, the term has been traditionally understood in two different ways. On one hand, some authors (J. Gascon y Marin, P. Kazansky, A, Rapisardi-Mirabelli) used this term regarding the administrative competencies of those various &quot;international administrative unions&quot;. On the other hand, other authors (P. Fedozzi, K. Neumeyer, G. Biscottini) used the term to exclusively refer to the norms of national administrative law, which address certain foreign elements; i.e. as a parallel to the discipline of international private law. This article deals with these two different understandings of &quot;international administrative law&quot; and with their impact for recent developments in legal scholarship. The article also addresses currently renewed interest in the &quot;international administrative law&quot; and its consequences for the newly established doctrine of &quot;global administrative law&quot;.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JURIDICAL TRIBUNE-TRIBUNA JURIDICA

ISSN

2247-7195

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

RO - Rumunsko

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

363-376

Kód UT WoS článku

000472635000007

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—