The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU in the Czech Judicial Decisions: Falling Short of Expectations?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F19%3A10398504" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/19:10398504 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=c713r3nAvF" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=c713r3nAvF</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU in the Czech Judicial Decisions: Falling Short of Expectations?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
ollowing the Lisbon Treaty, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ("the Char- ter") became a part of the primary law of the EU. Although one may expect intensified protection of funda- mental rights on the European continent, many scholars suggested otherwise, pointing to considerable limitations posed on the Charter's application. This is especially the case of the so-called third generation rights, which have been left under the exclusive disposition of the Member States. The essay begins with drawing attention to the Charter's inherent limitations as interpreted by the CJEU. The author then focuses on the general use of the Charter in the case law of Czech courts, and proceeds to the assessment of its (in)application in particular cases concerning social and economic rights in order to ex- amine the potential shift in the intensity of their protection. It is concluded that the evidence does not suggest any change in the analysed area after the Charter's incorporation into the primary law.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU in the Czech Judicial Decisions: Falling Short of Expectations?
Popis výsledku anglicky
ollowing the Lisbon Treaty, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ("the Char- ter") became a part of the primary law of the EU. Although one may expect intensified protection of funda- mental rights on the European continent, many scholars suggested otherwise, pointing to considerable limitations posed on the Charter's application. This is especially the case of the so-called third generation rights, which have been left under the exclusive disposition of the Member States. The essay begins with drawing attention to the Charter's inherent limitations as interpreted by the CJEU. The author then focuses on the general use of the Charter in the case law of Czech courts, and proceeds to the assessment of its (in)application in particular cases concerning social and economic rights in order to ex- amine the potential shift in the intensity of their protection. It is concluded that the evidence does not suggest any change in the analysed area after the Charter's incorporation into the primary law.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
The Lawyer Quarterly
ISSN
1805-8396
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2019
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
228-247
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85074084161