Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Taking of Evidence in Construction Arbitration: Focus on the Czech Republic

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F19%3A10414977" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/19:10414977 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Taking of Evidence in Construction Arbitration: Focus on the Czech Republic

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This chapter concerns the very broad and varied issues that may arise in evidence gathering and evidence assessment in construction arbitration. When parties work together for a long time, as the case usually is in the construction industry, their cooperation involves a complex set of facts and diverse legal questions. This is further amplified by the fact that construction arbitration often involves a number of parties with divergent interests. A multiparty construction dispute may involve a contractor and an employer as the contractual parties to the contract for work and also many subcontractors, project managers, architects, designers, consultants, engineers, suppliers and banks or insurance companies. Apart from the hurdle of consolidating all these parties into one arbitral proceeding while relying on their consent, such cooperation also generates accordingly voluminous documentation. These features of construction arbitration generally require arbitral tribunals to use their powers towards careful case management and efficient conduct of the proceedings from the very beginning. Importantly, the proactive role of the tribunal is essential with regard to taking of evidence. These issues and the role of the arbitral tribunal are summarized in the introduction of the chapter (§ 8.01) followed by a description of the process of evidence gathering (§ 8.02). The chapter further focuses on the forms the evidence is usually manifested in: documentary (§ 8.03), expert (§ 8.04) and factual evidence (§ 8.05). The findings are summarized in the conclusion (§ 8.06).

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Taking of Evidence in Construction Arbitration: Focus on the Czech Republic

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This chapter concerns the very broad and varied issues that may arise in evidence gathering and evidence assessment in construction arbitration. When parties work together for a long time, as the case usually is in the construction industry, their cooperation involves a complex set of facts and diverse legal questions. This is further amplified by the fact that construction arbitration often involves a number of parties with divergent interests. A multiparty construction dispute may involve a contractor and an employer as the contractual parties to the contract for work and also many subcontractors, project managers, architects, designers, consultants, engineers, suppliers and banks or insurance companies. Apart from the hurdle of consolidating all these parties into one arbitral proceeding while relying on their consent, such cooperation also generates accordingly voluminous documentation. These features of construction arbitration generally require arbitral tribunals to use their powers towards careful case management and efficient conduct of the proceedings from the very beginning. Importantly, the proactive role of the tribunal is essential with regard to taking of evidence. These issues and the role of the arbitral tribunal are summarized in the introduction of the chapter (§ 8.01) followed by a description of the process of evidence gathering (§ 8.02). The chapter further focuses on the forms the evidence is usually manifested in: documentary (§ 8.03), expert (§ 8.04) and factual evidence (§ 8.05). The findings are summarized in the conclusion (§ 8.06).

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    Construction Arbitration in Central and Eastern Europe: Contemporary Issues

  • ISBN

    978-94-035-0331-8

  • Počet stran výsledku

    20

  • Strana od-do

    141-160

  • Počet stran knihy

    312

  • Název nakladatele

    Kluwer Law International B.V.

  • Místo vydání

    Neuveden.

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly