In search of the perfect denial of benefits clause
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F19%3A10415112" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/19:10415112 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=3yHxOclTtE" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=3yHxOclTtE</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
In search of the perfect denial of benefits clause
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Denial of benefits clauses are perceived as means that can provide protection from unwelcome treaty shopping in international investment law. However, a handful of application problems materialised when the investment tribunals deliberated on how the clauses operate. As a result, not in all of the cases that the denial of benefit clause was invoked have the states been successful although the situation could have been interpreted as a clear example of treaty shopping. This is mainly due to the wording of the clauses or more precisely due to their gaps. This paper will examine whether states succeeded to reflect those application problems raised during the decision-making process connected to the denial of benefits clauses in their newly concluded investment agreements, i.e. whether any lessons were learned from the evolvement of the interpretation problems of denial of benefits clauses.
Název v anglickém jazyce
In search of the perfect denial of benefits clause
Popis výsledku anglicky
Denial of benefits clauses are perceived as means that can provide protection from unwelcome treaty shopping in international investment law. However, a handful of application problems materialised when the investment tribunals deliberated on how the clauses operate. As a result, not in all of the cases that the denial of benefit clause was invoked have the states been successful although the situation could have been interpreted as a clear example of treaty shopping. This is mainly due to the wording of the clauses or more precisely due to their gaps. This paper will examine whether states succeeded to reflect those application problems raised during the decision-making process connected to the denial of benefits clauses in their newly concluded investment agreements, i.e. whether any lessons were learned from the evolvement of the interpretation problems of denial of benefits clauses.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law
ISSN
1805-0565
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
10
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2019
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
410-420
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85079834322