On the (in)applicability of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights to national measures exceeding the requirements of minimum harmonisation Directives
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F21%3A10423649" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/21:10423649 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=dZxEH1IaG6" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=dZxEH1IaG6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
On the (in)applicability of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights to national measures exceeding the requirements of minimum harmonisation Directives
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article responds to the Court of Justice of the European Union's ( CJEU's) recent judgment in TSN and AKT (C-609/17 and C-610/17), in which the Grand Chamber ruled on the fundamental question of whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is applicable to national measures that exceed the requirements of minimum harmonisation EU directives. Faced with a choice between two competing theories which had developed in the case law and scholarship, the CJEU decided-against the advice of AG Bot-that such national measures, insofar as they exceed those minimum requirements, do not fall within the scope of the EU Charter. This article discusses the reasoning relied on by the Advocate General and the Grand Chamber respectively, with an emphasis on the key difference between power-granting and power-recognising clauses in EU directives. The article then reflects on some conceptual and terminological implications of the CJEU's ruling. The aim is to bring further clarity, and a certain refinement, when it comes to determining the Charter's applicability to national "toppings" to minimum harmonisation EU directives.
Název v anglickém jazyce
On the (in)applicability of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights to national measures exceeding the requirements of minimum harmonisation Directives
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article responds to the Court of Justice of the European Union's ( CJEU's) recent judgment in TSN and AKT (C-609/17 and C-610/17), in which the Grand Chamber ruled on the fundamental question of whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is applicable to national measures that exceed the requirements of minimum harmonisation EU directives. Faced with a choice between two competing theories which had developed in the case law and scholarship, the CJEU decided-against the advice of AG Bot-that such national measures, insofar as they exceed those minimum requirements, do not fall within the scope of the EU Charter. This article discusses the reasoning relied on by the Advocate General and the Grand Chamber respectively, with an emphasis on the key difference between power-granting and power-recognising clauses in EU directives. The article then reflects on some conceptual and terminological implications of the CJEU's ruling. The aim is to bring further clarity, and a certain refinement, when it comes to determining the Charter's applicability to national "toppings" to minimum harmonisation EU directives.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Law Review
ISSN
0307-5400
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
46
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
81-91
Kód UT WoS článku
000619635200006
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—