The unbearable lightness of nuclear jurisprudence
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F21%3A10429705" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/21:10429705 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=7yYUpUjXZf" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=7yYUpUjXZf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2020.1832820" target="_blank" >10.1080/02646811.2020.1832820</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The unbearable lightness of nuclear jurisprudence
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The nature of nuclear law as a peculiar legal discipline has been discussed in academic scholarship since the early 1960s. A special system of principles has emerged in this field, which clearly distinguishes nuclear law from other areas of law. At the same time, there is a tacit consensus in legal academia that nuclear law represents a special (sub)discipline of energy law. Reflecting the current debate, discussing (a claimed) 'immaturity' of energy law, this contribution argues that energy law is obviously composed of several (sub)disciplines which are in various stages of development and different degrees of academic recognition. Thus, this article argues that rather than perceiving energy law as a coherent discipline, we must consider it an amalgam of various (sub)disciplines governing different sources of energy.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The unbearable lightness of nuclear jurisprudence
Popis výsledku anglicky
The nature of nuclear law as a peculiar legal discipline has been discussed in academic scholarship since the early 1960s. A special system of principles has emerged in this field, which clearly distinguishes nuclear law from other areas of law. At the same time, there is a tacit consensus in legal academia that nuclear law represents a special (sub)discipline of energy law. Reflecting the current debate, discussing (a claimed) 'immaturity' of energy law, this contribution argues that energy law is obviously composed of several (sub)disciplines which are in various stages of development and different degrees of academic recognition. Thus, this article argues that rather than perceiving energy law as a coherent discipline, we must consider it an amalgam of various (sub)disciplines governing different sources of energy.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law
ISSN
0264-6811
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
39
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
375-383
Kód UT WoS článku
000581876300001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85093659086