May the Czech Railways lodge an application with the European Court of Human Rights? Legal standing of state-owned companies: approaches of the Czech Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F21%3A10430915" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/21:10430915 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
May the Czech Railways lodge an application with the European Court of Human Rights? Legal standing of state-owned companies: approaches of the Czech Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper's goal is to compare the standing of state-owned companies as applicants before the European Court of Human Rights, as opposed to before the Czech Constitutional Court. It will be argued that the European Convention's principle of 'sufficient institutional and operational independence from the state' is not relevant for the practice of the Czech Constitutional Court. The analysis should prove that the approaches of the European Court of Human Rights and the Czech Constitutional Court are based on significantly distinctive concepts. Both the 'European Convention model' and the 'Czech model' will be defined not only from the perspective of current case-law, but also with regard to the underlying principles of the human rights protection, as applied by these two courts. This comparison may serve as a basis for describing the cross-fertilization of both institutions, while keeping in mind the spirit of the European Convention of Human Rights.
Název v anglickém jazyce
May the Czech Railways lodge an application with the European Court of Human Rights? Legal standing of state-owned companies: approaches of the Czech Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper's goal is to compare the standing of state-owned companies as applicants before the European Court of Human Rights, as opposed to before the Czech Constitutional Court. It will be argued that the European Convention's principle of 'sufficient institutional and operational independence from the state' is not relevant for the practice of the Czech Constitutional Court. The analysis should prove that the approaches of the European Court of Human Rights and the Czech Constitutional Court are based on significantly distinctive concepts. Both the 'European Convention model' and the 'Czech model' will be defined not only from the perspective of current case-law, but also with regard to the underlying principles of the human rights protection, as applied by these two courts. This comparison may serve as a basis for describing the cross-fertilization of both institutions, while keeping in mind the spirit of the European Convention of Human Rights.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
70th Anniversary of the EURO PEAN convention on Human Rights
ISBN
978-3-946915-66-9
Počet stran výsledku
16
Strana od-do
95-110
Počet stran knihy
207
Název nakladatele
rw&w Science & New Media Passau-Berlin-Prague
Místo vydání
Waldkirchen
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—