Hesitantly towards mutual recognition of "vaccination passports". A survey on potential ubiquity in administrative law
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F21%3A10433219" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/21:10433219 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=qZbCMKtoYL" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=qZbCMKtoYL</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2021/11/SP/01" target="_blank" >10.24818/TBJ/2021/11/SP/01</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Hesitantly towards mutual recognition of "vaccination passports". A survey on potential ubiquity in administrative law
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The problem of potential ubiquity emerged in administrative law because of transboundary circulation of various certificates, licences and permits. These documents, approving certain facts, may appear before an administrative authority of another State. Thus, the applicable regime of public law must qualify the legal consequences of such documents in the realm of the applicable administrative law. This article aims to discuss this problem with regard to the challenges arising in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemics. Prospective introduction of "immunity certificates" and "vaccination passports" in various jurisdictions and the need to establish mutual recognition of such "passports" and "certificates" is the subject of attention. The article points out existence of several dogmatic approaches to the fact that foreign administrations have either approved a fact, or granted a right. Some of these dogmatic approaches have been reflected in the written law. However, at the same time, in theory, other solutions than those provided by the current legal framework would also be theoretically possible. The importance of these theoretical considerations is demonstrated regarding the very current discussions on the introduction of "immunity certificates" and "vaccination passports".
Název v anglickém jazyce
Hesitantly towards mutual recognition of "vaccination passports". A survey on potential ubiquity in administrative law
Popis výsledku anglicky
The problem of potential ubiquity emerged in administrative law because of transboundary circulation of various certificates, licences and permits. These documents, approving certain facts, may appear before an administrative authority of another State. Thus, the applicable regime of public law must qualify the legal consequences of such documents in the realm of the applicable administrative law. This article aims to discuss this problem with regard to the challenges arising in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemics. Prospective introduction of "immunity certificates" and "vaccination passports" in various jurisdictions and the need to establish mutual recognition of such "passports" and "certificates" is the subject of attention. The article points out existence of several dogmatic approaches to the fact that foreign administrations have either approved a fact, or granted a right. Some of these dogmatic approaches have been reflected in the written law. However, at the same time, in theory, other solutions than those provided by the current legal framework would also be theoretically possible. The importance of these theoretical considerations is demonstrated regarding the very current discussions on the introduction of "immunity certificates" and "vaccination passports".
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA20-01320S" target="_blank" >GA20-01320S: Mezinárodní právo správní: Znovuobjevení právní disciplíny</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Juridical Tribune
ISSN
2247-7195
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
9
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
Special Issue
Stát vydavatele periodika
RO - Rumunsko
Počet stran výsledku
14
Strana od-do
277-290
Kód UT WoS článku
000712443300001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—