Proportionality Means Proportionality : Czech Constitutional Court, 2 February 2021, Pl. ÚS 44/17

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F21%3A10434756" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/21:10434756 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=5e-w3damUM" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=5e-w3damUM</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000328" target="_blank" >10.1017/S1574019621000328</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Proportionality Means Proportionality : Czech Constitutional Court, 2 February 2021, Pl. ÚS 44/17

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article critically analyses the Czech Constitutional Court&apos;s decision Pl. ÚS 44/17 which quashed several provisions of the Parliamentary Election Act as unconstitutional because the cumulative integrative effects of the provisions on the electoral system excessively distorted the proportionality principle required by the Constitution of the Czech Republic. The article argues that the decision is not well explained, often inconsistent, contradictory, and generally based on deficient preliminary considerations, especially the unexplained &apos;bad-faith&apos; of the legislature, the blurring of the requirements for proportionality and equality and the argument that the social diversity can only be reflected by the proportionality between political parties achieved at the national level. The article also focuses on the character and proportionality of the newly adopted electoral system.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Proportionality Means Proportionality : Czech Constitutional Court, 2 February 2021, Pl. ÚS 44/17

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article critically analyses the Czech Constitutional Court&apos;s decision Pl. ÚS 44/17 which quashed several provisions of the Parliamentary Election Act as unconstitutional because the cumulative integrative effects of the provisions on the electoral system excessively distorted the proportionality principle required by the Constitution of the Czech Republic. The article argues that the decision is not well explained, often inconsistent, contradictory, and generally based on deficient preliminary considerations, especially the unexplained &apos;bad-faith&apos; of the legislature, the blurring of the requirements for proportionality and equality and the argument that the social diversity can only be reflected by the proportionality between political parties achieved at the national level. The article also focuses on the character and proportionality of the newly adopted electoral system.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Constitutional Law Review

ISSN

1574-0196

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

538-552

Kód UT WoS článku

000724739300010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85121008927