The Connally Reservation (Self-judging Reservation) to Declaration of Acceptance of the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the ICJ under Art. 36(2) of the Statute

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F21%3A10435741" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/21:10435741 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=cgFSHpb27x" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=cgFSHpb27x</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Connally Reservation (Self-judging Reservation) to Declaration of Acceptance of the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the ICJ under Art. 36(2) of the Statute

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Under Article 36(2) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, states may accept jurisdiction of the Court by the form of unilateral declaration. They are also allowed to exclude certain topics from the acceptance of the Court&apos;s jurisdiction. Practice of these reservations to the jurisdiction of the ICJ included also so-called Connally reservations that exclude &quot;matters within domestic jurisdiction of the declarant state, as the State considers them&quot;. The self-judging part of such reservation has been source of controversy and several states withdrew it. Four states however maintain to use it and this article is dedicated to presenting and discussing opinions as to the validity and effects of them.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Connally Reservation (Self-judging Reservation) to Declaration of Acceptance of the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the ICJ under Art. 36(2) of the Statute

Popis výsledku anglicky

Under Article 36(2) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, states may accept jurisdiction of the Court by the form of unilateral declaration. They are also allowed to exclude certain topics from the acceptance of the Court&apos;s jurisdiction. Practice of these reservations to the jurisdiction of the ICJ included also so-called Connally reservations that exclude &quot;matters within domestic jurisdiction of the declarant state, as the State considers them&quot;. The self-judging part of such reservation has been source of controversy and several states withdrew it. Four states however maintain to use it and this article is dedicated to presenting and discussing opinions as to the validity and effects of them.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law

ISSN

1805-0565

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2021

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

12

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

101-113

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85123593574