The Czech Constitutional Court in times of populism

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F21%3A10480366" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/21:10480366 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003148944" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003148944</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003148944" target="_blank" >10.4324/9781003148944</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Czech Constitutional Court in times of populism

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The Czech Constitutional Court (CCC) is one of the strongest constitutional tribunals anywhere in the world. Its design is framed after the German model of the Federal Constitutional Court. Between 1993 and 2020, the political landscape of the Czech Republic has changed significantly. The strategies and the nature of presidential appointments have differed, depending on the president in question. The Chief Justice preferred legal wisdom over political ideology. It was only when the President realized that the CCC was not functioning in the way he would like that he interrupted his consultations with the Chief Justice. The institutional position of the CCC has been markedly strengthened by its own decision-making in the first two decades of its existence. The new court appointed by the third President, Zeman, continued on this newly opened path of judicial self-restraint. The situation began changing only in 2001, in response to certain constitutional excesses by the parliamentary majority.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Czech Constitutional Court in times of populism

Popis výsledku anglicky

The Czech Constitutional Court (CCC) is one of the strongest constitutional tribunals anywhere in the world. Its design is framed after the German model of the Federal Constitutional Court. Between 1993 and 2020, the political landscape of the Czech Republic has changed significantly. The strategies and the nature of presidential appointments have differed, depending on the president in question. The Chief Justice preferred legal wisdom over political ideology. It was only when the President realized that the CCC was not functioning in the way he would like that he interrupted his consultations with the Chief Justice. The institutional position of the CCC has been markedly strengthened by its own decision-making in the first two decades of its existence. The new court appointed by the third President, Zeman, continued on this newly opened path of judicial self-restraint. The situation began changing only in 2001, in response to certain constitutional excesses by the parliamentary majority.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Populist Challenges to Constitutional Interpretation in Europe and Beyond

ISBN

978-1-00-314894-4

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

161-175

Počet stran knihy

346

Název nakladatele

Routledge

Místo vydání

London

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—