Governing Without Being in Power? Controversial Promises for a New Transition to the Rule of Law in Hungary

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F22%3A10444259" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/22:10444259 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=-Q2_obJXA2" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=-Q2_obJXA2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/0044-2348-2022-1-223" target="_blank" >10.17104/0044-2348-2022-1-223</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Governing Without Being in Power? Controversial Promises for a New Transition to the Rule of Law in Hungary

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

After 12 years of the governance of the national-conservative Fidesz in Hungary, from 2020 on, there seemed to be a real chance that the united opposition would win the election in Spring 2022. But even if the current opposition governs, either from 2022 or later it will face serious problems about really being in power, as Fidesz cemented all significant rules, institutions and positions into the constitution and cardinal laws. These can only be amended with a two-thirds majority in parliament, and it is very unlikely that the opposition could win such a large majority. A unique situation is likely to occur within the European Union (EU): a member state will be facing dilemmas of constitutional transition, while as an EU-member, it was not (and could not be) considered as a dictatorship, from which exceptional transitions are the only way out. This article argues why a new government should avoid illegitimate constitution making or constitution amending without the required majority at all costs and suggests alternative solutions for living with &apos;Fidesz&apos;s constitution&apos;.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Governing Without Being in Power? Controversial Promises for a New Transition to the Rule of Law in Hungary

Popis výsledku anglicky

After 12 years of the governance of the national-conservative Fidesz in Hungary, from 2020 on, there seemed to be a real chance that the united opposition would win the election in Spring 2022. But even if the current opposition governs, either from 2022 or later it will face serious problems about really being in power, as Fidesz cemented all significant rules, institutions and positions into the constitution and cardinal laws. These can only be amended with a two-thirds majority in parliament, and it is very unlikely that the opposition could win such a large majority. A unique situation is likely to occur within the European Union (EU): a member state will be facing dilemmas of constitutional transition, while as an EU-member, it was not (and could not be) considered as a dictatorship, from which exceptional transitions are the only way out. This article argues why a new government should avoid illegitimate constitution making or constitution amending without the required majority at all costs and suggests alternative solutions for living with &apos;Fidesz&apos;s constitution&apos;.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LL2106" target="_blank" >LL2106: Identita a konstitucionalismus: Schopnost ústav formovat politická společenství v regionu EU-MENAP</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht

ISSN

0044-2348

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

82

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

32

Strana od-do

223-254

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85130489436