Decision-making on the Authorization of Mergers of Competitors
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F22%3A10444395" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/22:10444395 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Decision-making on the Authorization of Mergers of Competitors
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The decision making process of regulators concerning mergers of competition is the main ex ante tool to regulate competition (in other words - to ensure the optimal structure on the market) in order to protect the market, as both abuse of dominant position and cartel law mainly deal with the harm being already done. The aim of this paper is to find out and further describe the key parts of this process, i.e., what is able to influence the decision-making process (and how) and compare what may be stronger arguments made by the competitors in terms of getting the respective merger successfully through the decision making procedure. This is in practice mainly shown by focusing on the main part of the assessment, being the substantive test and its distinctive elements. The secondary aim is to open discussion on the topic of a personal base on competition authorities, requiring to have the necessary economical insight into the potential consequences of a merger, then allowing the authority to effectively question proposals being presented by merging competitors and rationally assess the actual risk for competition.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Decision-making on the Authorization of Mergers of Competitors
Popis výsledku anglicky
The decision making process of regulators concerning mergers of competition is the main ex ante tool to regulate competition (in other words - to ensure the optimal structure on the market) in order to protect the market, as both abuse of dominant position and cartel law mainly deal with the harm being already done. The aim of this paper is to find out and further describe the key parts of this process, i.e., what is able to influence the decision-making process (and how) and compare what may be stronger arguments made by the competitors in terms of getting the respective merger successfully through the decision making procedure. This is in practice mainly shown by focusing on the main part of the assessment, being the substantive test and its distinctive elements. The secondary aim is to open discussion on the topic of a personal base on competition authorities, requiring to have the necessary economical insight into the potential consequences of a merger, then allowing the authority to effectively question proposals being presented by merging competitors and rationally assess the actual risk for competition.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
EU Antitrust: Hot Topics & Next Steps
ISBN
978-80-7630-021-7
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
273-280
Název nakladatele
Charles University, Faculty of Law
Místo vydání
Praha
Místo konání akce
Praha
Datum konání akce
24. 1. 2022
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—